CDCB Logo

Introduction

This report compares Predicted Transmitting Abilities (PTAs) for AI bulls between the 2512 and 2508 genomic/DERT evaluations across all indices and traits defined in File38. Changes are quantified overall and by bull category. Analyses are restricted to bulls present in both File38 and to records with complete (non-missing) values for the specified traits in both the current and previous evaluation. The report also checks haplotype status for all evaluated animals, highlighting any discrepancies between the two evaluations.

NAAB breed code changes

No breed code changes.

 

PTAs check

Statistics by breed

HO

Number of AI bulls in file format38 for breed HO: 5572

Statistics PTAs evaluation 2512 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2512 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 484 442 503 465 655 54.2 31.4 2.9 2.0 -0.2 0.2 -0.6 0.7 0.1 1.9 -0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.0 0.9 0.1 22 -7 7.0
sd 380 360 390 379 644 41.1 21.1 0.1 1.9 2.0 0.5 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.6 1.2 0.1 0.5 0.8 1.5 1.0 0.5 191 88 0.3
min -1356 -1373 -1349 -1326 -3016 -138.0 -99.0 2.4 -6.3 -10.4 -1.9 -6.3 -5.5 -7.2 -16.7 -4.9 -0.5 -4.4 -3.8 -5.9 -4.3 -2.4 -714 -390 6.0
max 1226 1217 1264 1189 2780 156.0 82.0 3.5 7.2 6.3 2.5 7.0 5.7 6.4 9.5 6.4 0.4 1.5 2.5 6.0 3.8 2.4 655 324 7.9
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2508 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2508 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 488 445 507 468 638 54.4 31.1 2.89 2.14 -0.15 0.28 -0.49 0.70 0.20 1.83 -0.37 -0.01 0.01 0.24 0.97 0.76 0.07 20 -4 7.00
sd 379 360 389 379 638 40.8 20.8 0.14 1.91 2.02 0.47 1.30 1.44 1.63 2.58 1.16 0.12 0.50 0.78 1.44 0.97 0.48 187 84 0.27
min -1368 -1381 -1362 -1336 -3015 -139.0 -100.0 2.44 -6.10 -10.20 -1.70 -5.60 -5.40 -7.30 -16.70 -4.90 -0.50 -4.40 -3.60 -5.80 -4.20 -1.90 -697 -359 5.82
max 1233 1222 1272 1200 2716 157.0 78.0 3.55 7.10 6.30 2.50 6.90 5.60 6.40 9.60 6.40 0.40 1.40 2.50 5.50 3.50 2.20 643 311 7.82
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508 for AI bulls.
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean -3 -3 -4 -4 16 -0.2 0.3 0.01 -0.09 -0.07 -0.04 -0.09 0.01 -0.09 0.03 -0.01 -0.01 0.00 -0.07 0.06 0.10 0.02 2 -3 0.02
sd 23 23 23 23 64 2.8 1.9 0.02 0.18 0.16 0.08 0.19 0.18 0.22 0.24 0.08 0.04 0.07 0.12 0.21 0.18 0.14 22 15 0.06
min -169 -171 -169 -160 -435 -23.0 -17.0 -0.12 -1.60 -0.80 -0.50 -1.30 -1.40 -1.20 -1.40 -1.50 -0.20 -0.60 -1.00 -0.80 -1.70 -1.70 -112 -67 -0.47
max 173 172 176 172 531 22.0 15.0 0.11 0.70 0.60 0.20 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.70 1.30 0.10 0.30 0.30 1.30 1.10 0.60 102 119 0.28
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508, by AI bulls’ status.
Status No.  nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
A 634 -3 -2 -3 -3 21 -0.2 0.4 0.01 -0.08 -0.05 -0.03 -0.07 -0.02 -0.09 0.02 -0.01 -0.01 -0.00 -0.07 0.05 0.10 0.03 2 -3 0.02
F 549 -0 0 -0 0 9 0.1 0.2 0.00 -0.01 -0.02 -0.01 0.02 -0.01 0.02 -0.03 -0.00 -0.00 -0.01 -0.03 -0.00 0.03 0.02 -3 3 0.00
G 4389 -4 -3 -4 -4 17 -0.2 0.4 0.01 -0.10 -0.07 -0.05 -0.10 0.02 -0.10 0.03 -0.01 -0.01 0.00 -0.07 0.07 0.10 0.01 2 -3 0.02
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508, by AI bulls’ year of birth.
Year No.  nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
2024 706 -6 -6 -7 -6 18 -0.5 0.4 0.01 -0.13 -0.09 -0.06 -0.12 0.03 -0.12 0.05 -0.01 -0.01 -0.00 -0.07 0.09 0.10 0.01 3 -3 0.02
2023 1634 -3 -2 -3 -4 16 0.1 0.4 0.01 -0.10 -0.09 -0.05 -0.14 0.02 -0.15 0.02 -0.02 -0.02 -0.00 -0.07 0.06 0.11 -0.01 3 -5 0.01
2022 1047 -4 -3 -4 -4 21 -0.4 0.4 0.01 -0.11 -0.08 -0.06 -0.09 0.00 -0.09 0.06 -0.01 -0.01 0.01 -0.10 0.11 0.14 0.03 3 -4 0.03
2021 678 -4 -4 -5 -4 16 -0.5 0.3 0.01 -0.08 -0.05 -0.03 -0.05 0.00 -0.06 0.02 -0.00 -0.01 -0.00 -0.06 0.07 0.07 0.01 1 -2 0.01
2020 443 -2 -1 -2 -2 27 -0.1 0.6 0.01 -0.08 -0.02 -0.03 -0.06 -0.02 -0.08 0.04 -0.01 -0.01 0.01 -0.07 0.04 0.12 0.04 -1 -3 0.02
2019 293 -3 -2 -4 -3 18 -0.2 0.2 0.00 -0.05 -0.06 -0.02 -0.04 -0.01 -0.03 -0.01 -0.00 -0.00 0.01 -0.03 0.07 0.06 0.02 -2 3 0.01
2018 175 -3 -2 -3 -4 0 -0.5 -0.2 0.00 -0.01 0.01 -0.02 -0.04 -0.02 -0.03 -0.01 0.00 0.00 -0.00 -0.03 0.01 0.05 0.04 2 -1 0.01
2017 199 -4 -3 -4 -4 0 -0.2 -0.1 0.00 -0.04 -0.00 -0.01 -0.04 -0.01 -0.03 -0.04 0.00 0.00 -0.01 -0.02 -0.01 0.03 0.02 -1 1 0.01
2016 85 -3 -2 -3 -3 -1 0.0 -0.1 0.00 -0.03 -0.03 0.01 -0.01 -0.01 -0.00 -0.03 -0.00 -0.00 -0.01 -0.02 -0.07 -0.02 0.01 -2 3 0.01
2015 123 -1 -1 -1 -1 2 0.1 0.0 0.00 -0.01 -0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.01 -0.06 0.00 -0.00 -0.01 -0.03 -0.03 0.04 0.03 -2 2 -0.00

PTAs statistics and distribution by indexes and traits

nm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -3.6
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 1

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -2.49
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 1

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

cm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -4.11
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 1

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

gm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -3.1
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 1

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mil

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): 13.03
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fat

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -0.4
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 1

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

pro

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): 0.16
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

scs

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.03
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

pl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -0.07
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

liv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -0.06
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

hlv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.04
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

dpr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.07
  • Slope (b): 1.03
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

hcr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.01
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

ccr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.09
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

efc

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): 0
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

gl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 1

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mfv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.94
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 0.96
  • R-squared (R²): 0.88

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

dpa

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

ket

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.07
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mas

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.04
  • Slope (b): 1.03
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

met

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.07
  • Slope (b): 1.04
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

rpl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.96
  • Intercept (a): 0.01
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.93

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fs

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 1.52
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

rfi

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -2.49
  • Slope (b): 1.03
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mspd

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): 0.17
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.95

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

JE

Number of AI bulls in file format38 for breed JE: 647

Statistics PTAs evaluation 2512 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2512 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 230 202 242 208 223 23.9 14.6 2.9 1.7 -0.1 0.1 -0.3 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 -0.4 0.3 0.1 . . .
sd 297 290 302 283 802 30.2 23.9 0.1 2.1 1.4 0.6 1.7 1.5 1.8 2.2 1.2 0.2 0.3 0.7 1.5 0.5 0.2 . . .
min -952 -900 -977 -1012 -2582 -95.0 -79.0 2.6 -5.1 -5.8 -1.8 -5.1 -4.4 -5.4 -9.8 -4.6 -0.7 -1.4 -2.7 -6.4 -1.6 -0.9 . . .
max 664 657 668 637 2474 76.0 68.0 3.5 6.6 4.3 1.8 7.7 4.7 5.7 6.0 3.1 0.5 1.0 3.1 4.3 1.9 0.8 . . .
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2508 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2508 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 238 211 249 214 233 24.3 14.6 2.94 1.86 -0.13 0.08 -0.30 0.26 -0.07 0.09 0.20 0.02 0.15 -0.07 -0.39 0.29 0.08 . . .
sd 303 297 308 288 807 30.5 24.0 0.13 2.18 1.43 0.54 1.73 1.49 1.77 2.17 1.16 0.18 0.32 0.58 1.52 0.49 0.22 . . .
min -970 -914 -996 -1022 -2608 -95.0 -81.0 2.58 -5.10 -6.00 -1.70 -5.20 -4.30 -5.30 -9.50 -4.30 -0.80 -1.20 -2.60 -8.20 -1.70 -0.80 . . .
max 691 690 694 658 2049 76.0 49.0 3.50 6.60 4.50 1.70 7.40 4.60 5.20 6.30 3.10 0.40 1.00 2.90 4.70 1.80 0.70 . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508 for AI bulls.
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean -8 -9 -8 -6 -10 -0.5 0.0 0.00 -0.13 0.00 -0.03 0.02 -0.03 0.06 0.12 -0.00 0.02 0.03 0.10 -0.03 -0.02 0.02 . . .
sd 25 24 25 24 66 2.9 2.1 0.02 0.26 0.20 0.11 0.22 0.27 0.24 0.39 0.06 0.05 0.09 0.21 0.41 0.18 0.10 . . .
min -123 -134 -120 -118 -485 -11.0 -13.0 -0.04 -1.50 -0.60 -0.40 -1.50 -1.90 -1.60 -1.50 -0.30 -0.20 -0.40 -0.50 -1.90 -1.80 -0.40 . . .
max 178 174 179 160 640 26.0 20.0 0.08 0.80 1.30 0.40 0.70 1.40 1.10 2.40 0.30 0.10 0.40 2.00 2.30 0.80 0.40 . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508, by AI bulls’ status.
Status No.  nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
A 127 -5 -6 -4 -3 -4 -0.1 0.2 0.00 -0.11 -0.00 -0.00 0.02 -0.08 0.04 0.06 -0.01 0.01 0.04 0.06 -0.03 -0.05 0.00 . . .
F 27 12 14 12 12 19 0.1 0.2 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.08 0.09 0.16 0.03 -0.00 0.00 0.04 -0.03 0.04 0.01 0.00 . . .
G 493 -10 -11 -9 -8 -13 -0.6 -0.1 0.01 -0.15 -0.01 -0.03 0.02 -0.02 0.06 0.13 -0.00 0.02 0.03 0.12 -0.03 -0.02 0.02 . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508, by AI bulls’ year of birth.
Year No.  nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
2024 105 -13 -14 -12 -11 -21 -0.7 -0.3 0.00 -0.19 -0.02 -0.04 -0.02 -0.07 0.04 0.18 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.14 -0.03 0.01 0.03 . . .
2023 179 -12 -13 -12 -10 -10 -0.8 -0.0 0.01 -0.17 -0.01 -0.05 0.05 0.02 0.09 0.11 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.17 -0.07 -0.04 0.03 . . .
2022 137 -8 -9 -8 -6 -12 -0.5 0.1 0.01 -0.16 0.01 -0.03 0.01 -0.02 0.04 0.18 -0.01 0.02 0.02 0.09 -0.07 -0.00 0.01 . . .
2021 55 -4 -4 -4 -2 1 -0.3 0.2 0.00 -0.04 -0.03 -0.02 0.08 -0.09 0.08 0.11 -0.01 0.01 0.04 0.10 0.15 -0.07 0.02 . . .
2020 51 -5 -7 -4 -4 -13 -0.0 0.3 0.01 -0.14 -0.00 -0.03 -0.00 -0.06 0.03 0.12 0.00 0.01 0.05 0.13 -0.10 -0.07 -0.00 . . .
2019 27 7 6 7 7 12 0.4 0.7 -0.00 0.00 0.06 0.01 0.01 -0.06 0.03 0.15 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.13 0.04 0.01 . . .
2018 18 -6 -6 -6 -6 -16 -0.6 -0.6 0.00 -0.06 0.02 0.02 0.00 -0.02 0.01 -0.05 -0.03 0.01 0.02 -0.05 -0.03 0.00 0.02 . . .
2017 36 0 1 0 1 3 -0.2 0.0 -0.00 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.08 -0.01 0.00 -0.01 0.01 -0.04 0.05 -0.04 -0.02 . . .
2016 18 -5 -6 -5 -4 -21 -0.4 -0.2 0.01 -0.05 0.02 0.02 0.01 -0.04 0.07 -0.07 -0.02 0.01 0.02 -0.06 -0.06 0.01 0.02 . . .
2015 7 4 5 3 5 7 -0.3 -0.1 0.00 0.06 0.10 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.11 -0.10 0.00 0.00 0.06 -0.07 -0.13 -0.09 0.00 . . .

PTAs statistics and distribution by indexes and traits

nm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -2.19
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -3.28
  • Slope (b): 0.97
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

cm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -1.84
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

gm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -1.87
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mil

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -7.87
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fat

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -0.16
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

pro

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): 0.13
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

scs

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.01
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

pl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.05
  • Slope (b): 0.96
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

liv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

hlv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -0.03
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

dpr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.02
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

hcr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -0.03
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

ccr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.06
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

efc

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 0.12
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

gl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): 0
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 1

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mfv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.96
  • Intercept (a): 0.01
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.93

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

dpa

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): 0.03
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.93

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

ket

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.95
  • Intercept (a): 0.11
  • Slope (b): 1.07
  • R-squared (R²): 0.9

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mas

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.96
  • Intercept (a): -0.05
  • Slope (b): 0.96
  • R-squared (R²): 0.93

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

met

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.94
  • Intercept (a): -0.03
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.88

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

rpl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.91
  • Intercept (a): 0.02
  • Slope (b): 0.97
  • R-squared (R²): 0.84

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fs

No data available for the comparison.

rfi

No data available for the comparison.

mspd

No data available for the comparison.

BS

Number of AI bulls in file format38 for breed BS: 145

Statistics PTAs evaluation 2512 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2512 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 249 216 264 236 510 25.1 24.8 2.9 1.4 0.5 . 0.8 0.6 0.4 2.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.1 -0.2 . . .
sd 255 241 263 263 578 24.9 19.1 0.2 1.8 1.6 . 2.0 1.4 1.9 2.9 1.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 1.1 0.3 0.2 . . .
min -539 -496 -560 -484 -1187 -60.0 -45.0 2.6 -3.8 -3.9 . -3.5 -5.4 -5.7 -7.8 -3.0 -0.3 -0.8 -0.5 -3.7 -1.0 -0.8 . . .
max 784 794 802 810 2393 79.0 62.0 3.4 6.0 4.6 . 5.4 4.7 4.8 8.7 4.5 0.1 0.6 0.6 3.6 0.6 0.5 . . .
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2508 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2508 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 257 224 271 245 506 24.9 24.5 2.94 1.60 0.58 . 1.03 0.49 0.45 2.26 0.24 0.02 -0.06 0.00 0.40 -0.07 -0.11 . . .
sd 263 248 272 270 591 25.6 19.7 0.15 1.76 1.57 . 1.95 1.38 1.87 2.88 1.05 0.07 0.19 0.19 1.04 0.33 0.21 . . .
min -540 -496 -561 -488 -1189 -60.0 -45.0 2.58 -3.80 -3.80 . -3.40 -5.40 -5.40 -7.80 -3.00 -0.30 -0.90 -0.40 -3.70 -1.00 -0.70 . . .
max 774 809 789 803 2421 78.0 61.0 3.39 6.00 4.70 . 5.30 3.80 4.60 9.40 4.50 0.10 0.60 0.70 3.50 0.60 0.50 . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508 for AI bulls.
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean -7 -8 -7 -8 4 0.3 0.3 -0.00 -0.18 -0.03 . -0.19 0.09 -0.06 0.01 0.01 -0.02 0.01 -0.02 0.05 -0.01 -0.06 . . .
sd 33 30 34 36 76 3.3 3.0 0.02 0.28 0.30 . 0.34 0.29 0.37 0.46 0.12 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.17 0.07 0.10 . . .
min -141 -129 -146 -159 -284 -17.0 -12.0 -0.05 -1.10 -1.20 . -1.80 -1.60 -1.60 -1.30 -0.40 -0.10 -0.10 -0.30 -0.40 -0.20 -0.30 . . .
max 78 69 82 87 220 9.0 11.0 0.06 0.60 1.30 . 0.50 0.90 1.00 1.50 0.30 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.90 0.20 0.30 . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508, by AI bulls’ status.
Status No.  nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
A 28 4 2 4 2 15 0.9 0.9 -0.01 -0.06 -0.01 . -0.14 0.02 -0.07 -0.03 -0.01 -0.02 0.02 -0.00 -0.00 0.02 -0.03 . . .
F 11 -13 -13 -13 -15 22 -0.5 0.6 -0.00 -0.32 0.03 . -0.23 0.14 -0.24 0.18 -0.01 -0.04 0.02 -0.05 -0.05 -0.01 -0.04 . . .
G 106 -10 -10 -9 -11 -1 0.2 0.2 -0.00 -0.19 -0.04 . -0.20 0.10 -0.03 0.01 0.02 -0.02 0.01 -0.02 0.07 -0.02 -0.08 . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508, by AI bulls’ year of birth.
Year No.  nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
2024 13 -24 -22 -25 -24 -42 -1.2 -1.9 -0.00 -0.25 0.01 . -0.21 0.17 -0.02 0.01 0.05 -0.02 0.01 -0.02 0.05 -0.02 -0.09 . . .
2023 36 -4 -5 -3 -5 18 0.4 0.8 -0.01 -0.14 -0.07 . -0.19 0.11 -0.03 0.03 0.05 -0.03 0.01 -0.01 0.04 -0.02 -0.06 . . .
2022 26 -7 -8 -7 -6 6 0.7 0.5 -0.00 -0.29 -0.03 . -0.14 0.01 -0.01 0.10 -0.06 -0.02 0.00 -0.03 0.06 -0.01 -0.07 . . .
2021 21 -28 -29 -27 -32 -42 -1.6 -1.0 -0.00 -0.16 -0.00 . -0.32 0.19 -0.07 -0.20 0.04 -0.01 0.02 -0.03 0.11 -0.02 -0.13 . . .
2020 12 -6 -6 -5 -8 32 0.8 0.9 -0.00 -0.32 0.08 . -0.29 0.06 -0.26 0.27 -0.01 -0.03 -0.01 -0.04 0.03 0.02 -0.02 . . .
2019 9 18 16 19 18 43 2.4 1.8 -0.02 -0.09 -0.09 . -0.12 -0.07 -0.07 -0.03 -0.01 -0.01 0.02 -0.01 0.11 -0.01 0.01 . . .
2018 12 2 -0 3 -0 38 1.6 1.8 -0.02 -0.17 -0.01 . -0.26 0.06 -0.12 -0.10 -0.01 -0.02 0.03 -0.03 -0.02 0.03 -0.08 . . .
2017 4 16 12 17 18 -2 1.8 0.8 -0.01 0.07 -0.08 . 0.12 0.10 0.23 -0.02 -0.05 -0.03 0.03 0.05 0.02 -0.03 -0.05 . . .
2016 3 -13 -14 -13 -10 -23 -1.3 -0.3 0.00 -0.17 0.03 . 0.03 0.30 0.13 -0.13 0.00 -0.03 0.00 -0.03 0.03 -0.03 -0.07 . . .
2015 4 12 13 12 10 33 1.2 0.8 -0.01 0.12 -0.05 . -0.08 0.05 -0.10 0.10 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.03 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 . . .

PTAs statistics and distribution by indexes and traits

nm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 2.19
  • Slope (b): 0.96
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.6
  • Slope (b): 0.97
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

cm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 3.29
  • Slope (b): 0.96
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

gm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.23
  • Slope (b): 0.96
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mil

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 19.15
  • Slope (b): 0.97
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fat

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 1.13
  • Slope (b): 0.97
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

pro

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 1.41
  • Slope (b): 0.96
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

scs

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.02
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

pl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.15
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

liv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 0.97
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

hlv

No data available for the comparison.

dpr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.18
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

hcr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 0.08
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

ccr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -0.06
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

efc

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.02
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

gl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.01
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mfv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.78
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 0.66
  • R-squared (R²): 0.6

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

dpa

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 0.01
  • Slope (b): 0.94
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

ket

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.94
  • Intercept (a): -0.02
  • Slope (b): 0.96
  • R-squared (R²): 0.88

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mas

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.04
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

met

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

rpl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.91
  • Intercept (a): -0.06
  • Slope (b): 1.06
  • R-squared (R²): 0.83

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fs

No data available for the comparison.

rfi

No data available for the comparison.

mspd

No data available for the comparison.

GU

Number of AI bulls in file format38 for breed GU: 67

Statistics PTAs evaluation 2512 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2512 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 76 64 82 52 -34 6.3 2.5 3.0 1.4 0.8 . 0.1 -0.4 0.1 -0.2 0.3 . . . . . . . . .
sd 210 207 213 219 545 16.7 14.7 0.1 2.1 1.9 . 1.6 1.6 2.3 3.5 0.9 . . . . . . . . .
min -449 -416 -465 -416 -1532 -46.0 -45.0 2.6 -3.2 -3.0 . -3.0 -3.8 -4.8 -6.2 -2.7 . . . . . . . . .
max 524 505 534 520 1243 51.0 39.0 3.3 5.4 6.8 . 4.7 2.9 4.9 11.6 2.0 . . . . . . . . .
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2508 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2508 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 86 72 92 63 -17 6.7 3.3 2.96 1.44 0.78 . 0.06 -0.31 0.17 -0.30 0.32 . . . . . . . . .
sd 216 211 220 224 537 16.3 14.6 0.13 2.12 1.87 . 1.55 1.50 2.10 3.48 0.87 . . . . . . . . .
min -432 -400 -447 -405 -1539 -47.0 -46.0 2.61 -3.10 -3.10 . -2.80 -3.20 -4.30 -5.90 -2.70 . . . . . . . . .
max 549 526 560 550 1253 45.0 38.0 3.27 5.20 6.60 . 5.00 2.80 5.30 11.50 2.00 . . . . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508 for AI bulls.
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean -10 -8 -10 -11 -17 -0.4 -0.8 0.01 -0.01 -0.03 . 0.01 -0.06 -0.03 0.15 0.03 . . . . . . . . .
sd 37 36 37 34 97 3.7 3.3 0.03 0.27 0.33 . 0.28 0.24 0.41 0.48 0.21 . . . . . . . . .
min -145 -125 -154 -134 -340 -11.0 -15.0 -0.07 -0.70 -0.80 . -0.80 -0.70 -1.20 -1.30 -0.20 . . . . . . . . .
max 66 72 64 50 187 9.0 4.0 0.12 0.70 1.00 . 0.90 0.70 0.80 1.00 1.70 . . . . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508, by AI bulls’ status.
Status No.  nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
A 19 -13 -12 -13 -15 -24 -0.5 -0.9 0.01 -0.02 -0.01 . 0.01 -0.03 -0.06 0.29 0.08 . . . . . . . . .
G 48 -8 -7 -9 -9 -14 -0.4 -0.8 0.01 -0.01 -0.04 . 0.01 -0.07 -0.02 0.09 0.00 . . . . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508, by AI bulls’ year of birth.
Year No.  nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
2024 5 -10 -7 -12 -6 -9 0.8 -1.0 0.03 -0.18 -0.32 . -0.02 -0.16 0.12 0.28 0.02 . . . . . . . . .
2023 11 -6 -5 -7 -8 -17 0.1 -0.7 0.01 0.00 -0.07 . -0.08 -0.17 -0.13 -0.06 0.02 . . . . . . . . .
2022 15 -16 -13 -17 -17 -24 -1.8 -1.4 0.00 0.06 0.04 . 0.09 0.05 0.04 0.32 0.01 . . . . . . . . .
2021 11 -20 -16 -21 -19 -34 -1.2 -2.2 0.01 -0.03 -0.15 . 0.05 -0.09 0.10 0.11 -0.01 . . . . . . . . .
2020 10 -17 -17 -18 -14 -21 -1.2 -0.5 0.01 -0.07 -0.11 . 0.21 0.04 0.20 0.05 -0.02 . . . . . . . . .
2019 5 6 7 6 -4 38 1.6 1.4 0.02 0.10 -0.04 . -0.24 -0.42 -0.52 0.02 0.00 . . . . . . . . .
2018 4 -2 -10 0 -9 -49 0.5 0.5 -0.00 -0.17 0.50 . -0.12 -0.03 -0.47 0.18 0.42 . . . . . . . . .
2017 1 -3 -1 -3 -5 -72 2.0 -3.0 -0.03 -0.10 -0.10 . -0.30 -0.10 -0.10 0.10 0.00 . . . . . . . . .
2015 3 23 24 24 19 37 2.3 1.0 -0.01 0.17 0.20 . -0.17 0.13 -0.07 0.43 -0.03 . . . . . . . . .

PTAs statistics and distribution by indexes and traits

nm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -5.85
  • Slope (b): 0.96
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -5.61
  • Slope (b): 0.96
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

cm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -6
  • Slope (b): 0.96
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

gm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -8.52
  • Slope (b): 0.97
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mil

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -17.17
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fat

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -0.39
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.95

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

pro

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -0.75
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.95

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

scs

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 0.01
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.95

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

pl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

liv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

hlv

No data available for the comparison.

dpr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 0.01
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

hcr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.03
  • Slope (b): 1.09
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

ccr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -0.04
  • Slope (b): 1.06
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

efc

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.14
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

gl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): 0.03
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.94

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mfv

No data available for the comparison.

dpa

No data available for the comparison.

ket

No data available for the comparison.

mas

No data available for the comparison.

met

No data available for the comparison.

rpl

No data available for the comparison.

fs

No data available for the comparison.

rfi

No data available for the comparison.

mspd

No data available for the comparison.

AY

Number of AI bulls in file format38 for breed AY: 52

Statistics PTAs evaluation 2512 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2512 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 260 248 266 256 624 27.0 22.2 3.0 0.6 0.6 . 0.1 0.7 0.0 3.9 -0.1 . . . . . . . . .
sd 290 274 298 296 727 29.6 24.9 0.1 1.5 1.2 . 1.4 1.3 1.4 5.4 1.0 . . . . . . . . .
min -205 -205 -221 -263 -519 -22.0 -24.0 2.8 -3.7 -2.2 . -2.6 -1.8 -2.9 -5.7 -2.3 . . . . . . . . .
max 965 864 1008 1002 2142 98.0 68.0 3.2 4.6 3.6 . 4.5 5.3 4.0 19.1 2.3 . . . . . . . . .
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2508 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2508 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 264 252 270 260 646 26.6 22.9 2.98 0.60 0.62 . 0.03 0.76 0.02 3.85 -0.11 . . . . . . . . .
sd 279 263 287 284 701 27.5 23.9 0.11 1.52 1.16 . 1.27 1.21 1.39 5.19 0.94 . . . . . . . . .
min -206 -190 -218 -256 -602 -23.0 -22.0 2.78 -3.80 -2.10 . -2.30 -1.80 -2.80 -5.10 -2.30 . . . . . . . . .
max 934 840 975 965 2039 95.0 66.0 3.22 4.70 3.60 . 4.50 5.10 4.10 17.40 2.30 . . . . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508 for AI bulls.
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean -4 -4 -4 -4 -22 0.4 -0.7 0.00 -0.05 0.01 . 0.03 -0.10 -0.00 0.02 0.02 . . . . . . . . .
sd 38 37 39 35 118 5.1 3.7 0.03 0.33 0.09 . 0.45 0.22 0.28 0.50 0.08 . . . . . . . . .
min -145 -137 -149 -126 -432 -15.0 -15.0 -0.06 -1.40 -0.20 . -1.10 -1.00 -0.60 -1.20 -0.20 . . . . . . . . .
max 67 60 70 62 186 16.0 7.0 0.05 0.50 0.20 . 2.20 0.20 0.80 1.70 0.30 . . . . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508, by AI bulls’ status.
Status No.  nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
A 8 -31 -33 -31 -26 -110 -2.1 -2.6 0.02 -0.34 -0.04 . -0.01 -0.17 0.20 0.45 0.05 . . . . . . . . .
F 4 26 25 26 25 74 2.5 2.5 -0.00 0.15 0.00 . 0.05 -0.08 0.02 -0.12 0.10 . . . . . . . . .
G 40 -1 -1 -2 -2 -14 0.7 -0.7 -0.00 -0.01 0.02 . 0.03 -0.09 -0.05 -0.06 -0.00 . . . . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508, by AI bulls’ year of birth.
Year No.  nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
2024 5 -3 0 -4 -6 -18 0.2 -1.6 -0.02 0.10 0.02 . -0.04 -0.12 -0.02 -0.18 0.02 . . . . . . . . .
2023 16 2 2 2 2 -32 2.4 -0.9 0.01 -0.09 0.01 . 0.06 -0.04 -0.06 -0.08 -0.01 . . . . . . . . .
2022 9 -3 -1 -3 -4 -6 -0.3 -0.8 -0.01 0.07 0.03 . -0.01 -0.14 0.03 -0.20 0.02 . . . . . . . . .
2021 6 -0 -3 1 0 7 -0.3 1.0 -0.01 -0.02 0.03 . 0.12 -0.08 -0.08 0.18 -0.03 . . . . . . . . .
2020 5 -31 -25 -33 -31 -44 -3.0 -3.0 0.01 -0.10 0.00 . -0.00 -0.38 -0.02 0.14 0.02 . . . . . . . . .
2019 2 18 18 19 20 -36 1.0 -0.5 0.01 0.50 0.00 . 0.20 0.05 0.60 -0.15 0.15 . . . . . . . . .
2018 5 -15 -20 -14 -8 -50 0.0 0.0 0.01 -0.50 -0.06 . -0.04 0.02 0.14 0.74 0.06 . . . . . . . . .
2017 3 -2 -4 -2 -6 -7 -0.3 0.3 0.01 0.03 0.03 . -0.07 -0.10 -0.20 -0.13 0.00 . . . . . . . . .

PTAs statistics and distribution by indexes and traits

nm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -12.55
  • Slope (b): 1.03
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -12.03
  • Slope (b): 1.03
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

cm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -12.44
  • Slope (b): 1.03
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

gm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -12.58
  • Slope (b): 1.03
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mil

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -37.22
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fat

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -1.29
  • Slope (b): 1.06
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

pro

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -1.46
  • Slope (b): 1.03
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

scs

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -0.21
  • Slope (b): 1.07
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

pl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -0.02
  • Slope (b): 0.96
  • R-squared (R²): 0.95

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

liv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): 0.01
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

hlv

No data available for the comparison.

dpr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.95
  • Intercept (a): 0.03
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.89

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

hcr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.12
  • Slope (b): 1.03
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

ccr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 0
  • Slope (b): 0.97
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

efc

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -0.1
  • Slope (b): 1.03
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

gl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): 0.02
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mfv

No data available for the comparison.

dpa

No data available for the comparison.

ket

No data available for the comparison.

mas

No data available for the comparison.

met

No data available for the comparison.

rpl

No data available for the comparison.

fs

No data available for the comparison.

rfi

No data available for the comparison.

mspd

No data available for the comparison.

XD

Number of AI bulls in file format38 for breed XD: 59

Statistics PTAs evaluation 2512 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2512 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 450 441 455 428 1374 59.5 43.0 2.9 1.2 1.7 1.7 1.3 0.0 1.2 1.5 -1.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 -0.2 0.4 0.0 -2 142 6.8
sd 150 157 148 145 644 17.3 15.4 0.1 1.1 0.8 0.3 1.3 1.0 1.3 1.3 0.9 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.0 0.7 0.2 . . .
min -469 -554 -436 -350 -2606 -30.0 -49.0 2.7 -2.9 -1.7 0.6 -2.2 -2.3 -1.8 -1.0 -3.3 -0.1 -0.3 -1.5 -2.5 -4.1 -0.7 -2 142 6.8
max 639 620 647 615 2253 88.0 62.0 3.4 2.9 3.3 2.5 5.8 3.1 3.8 7.3 2.5 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.6 1.3 0.5 -2 142 6.8
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2508 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2508 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 471 463 475 454 1375 58.8 42.7 2.89 1.29 1.7 1.72 1.24 0.03 1.30 1.26 -1.43 0.09 0.09 0.05 -0.25 0.32 -0.01 -4 143 6.82
sd 156 162 155 151 639 17.1 15.5 0.11 1.16 0.8 0.31 1.32 1.05 1.32 1.09 0.88 0.10 0.18 0.39 1.00 0.51 0.20 . . .
min -475 -553 -445 -353 -2578 -30.0 -50.0 2.70 -2.90 -1.3 0.50 -2.20 -2.20 -2.10 -1.00 -3.30 -0.10 -0.40 -1.30 -3.60 -2.40 -0.50 -4 143 6.82
max 642 626 648 624 2314 88.0 64.0 3.39 2.90 3.1 2.50 6.00 3.60 3.90 5.50 2.50 0.30 0.40 0.80 1.40 1.20 0.40 -4 143 6.82
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508 for AI bulls.
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean -20 -21 -20 -26 -0 0.6 0.3 0.00 -0.05 -0.01 0.01 0.03 -0.01 -0.07 0.29 -0.02 0.02 0.04 0.08 0.02 0.04 0.03 2 -1 -0.02
sd 58 57 59 72 69 4.2 3.0 0.02 0.40 0.21 0.07 0.31 0.40 0.39 0.57 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.24 0.31 0.27 0.11 . . .
min -164 -164 -164 -195 -133 -4.0 -4.0 -0.05 -1.10 -0.50 -0.20 -0.70 -0.80 -1.00 -0.30 -0.10 -0.10 -0.10 -0.20 -0.70 -1.70 -0.30 2 -1 -0.02
max 127 110 134 145 303 19.0 15.0 0.09 1.20 0.40 0.20 0.50 0.90 0.50 3.20 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.70 1.10 0.30 0.20 2 -1 -0.02
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508, by AI bulls’ status.
Status No.  nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
A 6 21 20 22 16 -38 2.2 -1.0 -0.02 0.38 -0.03 0.03 0.00 0.38 -0.02 1.57 -0.02 0.00 0.03 -0.12 0.08 -0.22 0.00 . . .
F 1 6 -1 9 3 -28 0.0 1.0 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0.10 -0.20 -0.10 -0.10 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.10 2 -1 -0.02
G 52 -26 -27 -25 -32 5 0.5 0.5 0.00 -0.10 -0.01 0.00 0.04 -0.05 -0.08 0.14 -0.02 0.03 0.04 0.10 0.01 0.06 0.03 . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508, by AI bulls’ year of birth.
Year No.  nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
2024 10 -55 -55 -55 -61 -20 -0.8 -0.5 0.01 -0.18 -0.14 -0.04 0.17 -0.02 0.06 0.09 -0.01 0.02 0.00 0.04 -0.09 0.07 -0.01 . . .
2023 24 -36 -37 -36 -50 6 0.2 0.4 -0.00 0.01 0.08 0.02 -0.09 -0.16 -0.25 0.16 -0.03 0.02 0.06 0.18 -0.02 0.08 0.03 . . .
2022 13 -14 -14 -15 -10 -22 -1.0 -0.8 0.01 -0.17 -0.05 -0.01 0.14 0.08 0.12 0.15 -0.01 0.05 0.02 0.05 0.03 0.10 0.08 . . .
2021 2 116 100 122 128 264 19.0 13.0 0.03 -0.75 -0.25 0.05 0.15 0.20 -0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.05 -0.05 0.60 -0.25 -0.10 . . .
2020 6 33 31 35 26 -26 2.3 -0.2 -0.02 0.57 0.03 0.00 0.02 0.28 0.03 1.38 -0.02 0.00 0.03 -0.10 0.13 0.08 0.05 . . .
2018 1 3 3 3 6 23 1.0 1.0 0.02 -0.10 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 -0.10 -0.10 -0.10 0.00 . . .
2017 2 8 6 10 7 -3 0.5 0.5 -0.01 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 -0.10 -0.10 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.05 0.15 2 -1 -0.02
2016 1 -57 -56 -57 -44 -61 -1.0 -2.0 0.00 -1.10 -0.40 0.20 0.00 0.40 -0.20 1.20 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 -1.70 -0.20 . . .

PTAs statistics and distribution by indexes and traits

nm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.93
  • Intercept (a): 30.36
  • Slope (b): 0.89
  • R-squared (R²): 0.86

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.94
  • Intercept (a): 23.29
  • Slope (b): 0.9
  • R-squared (R²): 0.88

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

cm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.93
  • Intercept (a): 33.29
  • Slope (b): 0.89
  • R-squared (R²): 0.86

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

gm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.88
  • Intercept (a): 44.17
  • Slope (b): 0.84
  • R-squared (R²): 0.78

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mil

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -3.43
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fat

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): 1.73
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.94

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

pro

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 1.48
  • Slope (b): 0.97
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

scs

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 0.01
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

pl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.94
  • Intercept (a): 0.11
  • Slope (b): 0.88
  • R-squared (R²): 0.88

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

liv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): -0.07
  • Slope (b): 1.03
  • R-squared (R²): 0.94

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

hlv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 0
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.95

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

dpr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): 0.06
  • Slope (b): 0.97
  • R-squared (R²): 0.95

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

hcr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.93
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 0.89
  • R-squared (R²): 0.86

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

ccr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.95
  • Intercept (a): 0.04
  • Slope (b): 0.92
  • R-squared (R²): 0.91

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

efc

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.9
  • Intercept (a): 0.19
  • Slope (b): 1.08
  • R-squared (R²): 0.82

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

gl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 1

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mfv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.91
  • Intercept (a): 0.02
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.83

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

dpa

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.93
  • Intercept (a): 0.04
  • Slope (b): 0.96
  • R-squared (R²): 0.86

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

ket

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.85
  • Intercept (a): 0.08
  • Slope (b): 0.97
  • R-squared (R²): 0.73

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mas

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.96
  • Intercept (a): 0.02
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.91

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

met

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): -0.09
  • Slope (b): 1.4
  • R-squared (R²): 0.94

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

rpl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.88
  • Intercept (a): 0.03
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.78

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fs

No data available for the comparison.

rfi

No data available for the comparison.

mspd

No data available for the comparison.

 

Haplotypes check

Statistics by breed, on all evaluated bulls

HO

  • Bulls with haplotype info (n.): 51083
  • Bulls first receiving haplotype info in evaluation 2512 (n.): 570
  • Bulls losing haplotype info in evaluation 2512 (n.): 139
  • Bulls with haplotype STATUS CHANGE in evaluation 2512 vs 2508 (n.): 16
Haplotype status changes:
Haplotype From (2508) To (2512) No. 
HCD 3 0 1
HCD 3 1 1
HH3 1 0 1
HH5 0 1 1
HH6 0 1 1
HHC 0 1 3
HHP 0 1 3
HHP 2 1 2
HHP 1 2 1
HHR 0 1 1
HHR 2 1 1

JE

  • Bulls with haplotype info (n.): 8842
  • Bulls first receiving haplotype info in evaluation 2512 (n.): 113
  • No bulls with haplotypes change.

BS

  • Bulls with haplotype info (n.): 6471
  • Bulls first receiving haplotype info in evaluation 2512 (n.): 18
  • Bulls losing haplotype info in evaluation 2512 (n.): 4
  • Bulls with haplotype STATUS CHANGE in evaluation 2512 vs 2508 (n.): 2
Haplotype status changes:
Haplotype From (2508) To (2512) No. 
BHM 0 1 2

AY

  • Bulls with haplotype info (n.): 1074
  • Bulls first receiving haplotype info in evaluation 2512 (n.): 10
  • No bulls with haplotypes change.