CDCB Logo

Introduction

This report compares Predicted Transmitting Abilities (PTAs) for AI bulls between the 2512 and 2508 traditional evaluations across all indices and traits defined in File38. Changes are quantified overall and by bull category. Analyses are restricted to bulls present in both File38 and to records with complete (non-missing) values for the specified traits in both the current and previous evaluation. The report also checks haplotype status for all evaluated animals, highlighting any discrepancies between the two evaluations.

NAAB breed code changes

No breed code changes.

 

PTAs check

Evaluation type: traditional

Statistics by breed

HO

Number of AI bulls in file format38 for breed HO: 5676

Statistics PTAs evaluation 2512 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2512 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 367 331 383 356 549 38.1 23.6 3.0 0.9 -0.9 0.2 -0.8 0.2 -0.4 0.3 -0.2 0.0 -0.2 -0.1 0.4 0.5 0.0 10 -5 7.0
sd 354 339 361 352 928 46.9 29.3 0.2 2.2 2.4 0.6 1.8 1.8 2.1 3.4 1.5 0.1 0.8 1.1 1.5 1.3 0.6 202 70 0.3
min -1459 -1477 -1451 -1433 -3125 -145.0 -101.0 2.5 -8.2 -12.5 -2.6 -5.8 -5.8 -7.5 -17.8 -4.6 -0.7 -6.7 -3.9 -5.0 -5.6 -3.4 -625 -393 6.0
max 1200 1156 1235 1163 2920 150.0 86.0 3.9 5.7 4.5 2.6 11.6 6.2 9.6 8.5 6.5 0.4 1.1 2.8 6.5 3.7 2.6 642 223 7.8
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2508 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2508 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 363 327 378 351 503 35.1 21.6 2.96 0.84 -0.85 0.19 -0.73 0.18 -0.39 0.04 -0.21 -0.04 -0.25 -0.06 0.23 0.39 0.00 10 -4 6.99
sd 348 335 355 347 946 48.2 30.2 0.16 2.20 2.35 0.58 1.74 1.78 2.15 3.39 1.51 0.15 0.81 1.06 1.40 1.28 0.53 200 66 0.26
min -1463 -1480 -1456 -1434 -3121 -146.0 -102.0 2.49 -7.70 -11.00 -2.70 -5.30 -5.80 -7.50 -17.90 -4.60 -0.70 -6.50 -4.00 -4.90 -6.20 -2.20 -623 -359 5.67
max 1207 1182 1218 1187 2639 153.0 77.0 3.90 5.90 4.60 2.60 11.50 5.30 9.40 9.60 6.50 0.40 1.20 2.60 4.50 3.50 2.50 662 212 7.86
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508 for AI bulls.
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 5 4 5 5 27 0.6 0.7 0.00 -0.03 -0.02 -0.01 -0.05 0.01 -0.06 0.09 -0.01 -0.01 0.01 -0.04 0.06 0.13 0.02 -1 -0 0.01
sd 46 45 46 46 159 6.3 4.6 0.05 0.56 0.59 0.15 0.55 0.46 0.66 0.78 0.19 0.06 0.17 0.26 0.56 0.35 0.24 48 13 0.10
min -338 -342 -337 -283 -719 -26.0 -23.0 -0.24 -2.40 -2.70 -1.10 -3.50 -2.20 -2.90 -3.30 -3.30 -0.50 -1.30 -2.40 -2.40 -3.10 -2.10 -227 -77 -0.49
max 367 359 372 357 988 46.0 31.0 0.21 2.80 2.10 0.60 2.20 1.80 2.70 3.70 1.80 0.10 0.60 1.10 2.90 2.50 1.20 212 137 0.38
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508, by AI bulls’ status.
Status No.  nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
A 663 4 5 4 4 27 0.5 0.7 0.00 -0.03 -0.02 -0.02 -0.06 0.01 -0.07 0.09 -0.01 -0.01 0.01 -0.04 0.06 0.13 0.02 -1 -0 0.01
F 624 4 5 4 5 29 1.5 1.3 -0.00 0.01 -0.07 -0.00 0.05 0.02 0.08 0.06 -0.01 -0.01 0.02 -0.04 0.05 0.07 0.03 -13 2 -0.00
G 4389 5 4 5 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508, by AI bulls’ year of birth.
Year No.  nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
2024 706 4 2 4 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2023 1634 9 7 9 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2022 1047 1 2 1 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 678 7 6 7 7 -12 1.6 0.3 -0.01 -0.10 -0.04 -0.03 -0.04 -0.02 -0.03 0.01 -0.04 -0.02 -0.01 -0.06 0.08 0.19 -0.03 4 -1 -0.01
2020 450 9 9 8 8 63 1.4 1.8 0.01 -0.04 0.03 -0.02 -0.06 0.03 -0.12 0.25 -0.01 -0.01 0.03 -0.08 0.05 0.22 0.03 -6 -3 0.02
2019 301 -0 1 -1 0 30 -0.3 0.4 0.00 -0.02 -0.12 -0.02 -0.04 0.04 -0.04 0.03 -0.00 -0.02 0.02 -0.01 0.15 0.09 0.02 1 2 0.02
2018 190 -2 -2 -3 -4 16 -0.4 0.0 0.00 0.01 0.09 0.02 -0.09 -0.03 -0.05 0.00 -0.00 0.00 -0.01 -0.03 0.04 0.06 0.06 0 1 0.00
2017 214 -2 -2 -3 -3 10 -0.1 0.2 -0.00 -0.01 -0.08 -0.02 -0.05 -0.00 -0.06 -0.06 0.00 0.01 -0.01 0.00 -0.03 0.01 0.01 -0 2 0.01
2016 100 -3 -3 -3 -2 -3 0.0 -0.1 -0.00 -0.02 -0.11 0.02 -0.05 -0.06 0.01 0.04 0.00 -0.01 -0.00 0.01 -0.04 0.03 0.04 3 3 -0.00
2015 133 -0 -1 -0 0 -4 -0.6 0.1 -0.00 0.03 0.04 0.00 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.12 0.00 -0.01 -0.02 0.03 0.06 0.07 0.07 -5 4 0.00

PTAs statistics and distribution by indexes and traits

nm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 1.66
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 2.53
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

cm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 1.25
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

gm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 3.13
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mil

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 24.94
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fat

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.72
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

pro

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.76
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

scs

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.96
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.93

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

pl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): -0.02
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.94

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

liv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.94

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

hlv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): -0.02
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.94

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

dpr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.96
  • Intercept (a): -0.03
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.91

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

hcr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): 0.01
  • Slope (b): 0.97
  • R-squared (R²): 0.94

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

ccr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.95
  • Intercept (a): -0.06
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.91

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

efc

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): 0.09
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.95

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

gl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mfv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.93
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 0.92
  • R-squared (R²): 0.87

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

dpa

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 0.01
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

ket

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): -0.04
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.94

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mas

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.93
  • Intercept (a): 0.05
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.87

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

met

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): 0.11
  • Slope (b): 1.04
  • R-squared (R²): 0.93

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

rpl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.91
  • Intercept (a): 0.02
  • Slope (b): 1.04
  • R-squared (R²): 0.83

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fs

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): -1.37
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.94

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

rfi

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 0.07
  • Slope (b): 1.07
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mspd

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.93
  • Intercept (a): 0.38
  • Slope (b): 0.95
  • R-squared (R²): 0.87

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

JE

Number of AI bulls in file format38 for breed JE: 665

Statistics PTAs evaluation 2512 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2512 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 139 115 149 130 -24 11.4 5 3.0 0.1 -0.6 0.0 -0.2 -0.3 -0.3 -0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.5 0.1 0.1 . . .
sd 261 258 264 249 909 33.1 26 0.2 2.2 1.9 0.8 2.4 2.0 2.4 2.8 1.4 0.2 0.4 1.1 2.1 0.8 0.3 . . .
min -970 -982 -967 -980 -2559 -107.0 -70 2.6 -5.0 -5.9 -2.6 -4.9 -5.2 -5.1 -12.1 -3.9 -0.8 -1.8 -3.5 -6.8 -2.7 -0.8 . . .
max 606 564 627 591 2552 77.0 72 3.5 6.5 4.6 2.1 7.5 4.6 5.9 7.9 2.9 0.5 1.1 4.1 3.7 2.4 0.8 . . .
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2508 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2508 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 140 118 150 129 -33 10.8 4.0 2.98 0.14 -0.66 0.07 -0.26 -0.21 -0.35 -0.25 0.01 -0.02 -0.03 -0.10 -0.32 0.11 0.07 . . .
sd 263 261 265 248 924 33.0 26.3 0.16 2.21 1.88 0.72 2.39 1.96 2.38 2.67 1.43 0.22 0.43 1.06 2.08 0.76 0.30 . . .
min -958 -962 -974 -973 -2541 -109.0 -73.0 2.62 -4.80 -6.00 -2.40 -5.50 -5.30 -5.80 -11.50 -3.90 -0.90 -1.60 -3.60 -8.80 -2.30 -0.70 . . .
max 583 590 612 568 1870 69.0 52.0 3.51 7.00 4.90 2.10 6.50 4.30 5.30 6.10 2.90 0.50 0.90 4.10 3.60 2.00 0.70 . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508 for AI bulls.
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean -2 -3 -1 1 -8 -0.2 0.4 0.00 -0.05 0.04 0.01 0.07 -0.09 0.09 0.13 -0.02 0.01 0.04 0.07 -0.06 -0.07 -0.00 . . .
sd 40 39 41 40 126 5.8 4.0 0.03 0.55 0.41 0.15 0.48 0.47 0.57 0.96 0.10 0.08 0.13 0.36 0.83 0.39 0.16 . . .
min -188 -197 -184 -175 -386 -21.0 -9.0 -0.11 -2.40 -1.50 -0.60 -2.00 -2.60 -1.90 -3.20 -0.70 -0.30 -0.40 -0.70 -3.10 -3.00 -0.60 . . .
max 248 251 247 217 772 34.0 22.0 0.12 1.40 2.30 0.50 1.50 1.40 1.60 6.60 0.20 0.20 0.60 2.70 3.40 1.20 0.50 . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508, by AI bulls’ status.
Status No.  nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
A 130 -1 -3 0 2 -10 -0.1 0.4 0.00 -0.07 0.04 0.00 0.06 -0.10 0.11 0.13 -0.01 0.01 0.04 0.07 -0.06 -0.08 0.01 . . .
F 42 13 13 13 13 19 -1.3 1.2 0.01 0.26 0.09 0.05 0.27 -0.05 -0.10 0.17 -0.03 0.02 0.04 -0.03 -0.03 0.06 -0.07 . . .
G 493 -3 -4 -2 -1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508, by AI bulls’ year of birth.
Year No.  nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
2024 105 -4 -6 -4 -3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2023 179 -4 -6 -3 -0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2022 137 -5 -6 -4 -2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 55 5 4 6 8 24 -0.9 1.4 0.02 -0.03 0.10 -0.01 0.39 -0.16 0.40 0.09 -0.08 0.01 0.09 0.22 -0.30 -0.17 0.09 . . .
2020 51 1 -3 2 2 -37 -0.3 0.4 0.01 -0.30 0.01 -0.05 0.00 -0.27 0.04 0.39 -0.02 0.03 0.08 0.22 -0.26 -0.19 -0.00 . . .
2019 29 15 13 16 16 40 2.1 2.0 -0.01 0.18 0.13 -0.00 0.08 -0.00 0.19 0.49 0.00 -0.02 0.08 0.08 0.22 0.09 -0.00 . . .
2018 22 -7 -9 -6 -7 -29 -0.9 -0.8 0.00 -0.02 0.03 0.07 0.03 -0.11 0.02 -0.03 0.00 0.02 0.03 -0.04 0.10 -0.03 -0.03 . . .
2017 43 3 3 3 3 -8 -1.2 -0.0 -0.00 0.02 0.03 0.04 -0.01 0.02 0.02 0.04 -0.00 0.01 0.01 -0.02 0.07 -0.04 -0.04 . . .
2016 19 -3 -5 -2 -2 -24 -0.2 -0.1 0.01 -0.04 -0.02 0.03 0.02 -0.07 0.06 -0.19 -0.01 0.01 -0.01 -0.04 -0.09 0.02 0.04 . . .
2015 8 3 5 2 5 -6 -0.8 -0.7 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.03 0.20 0.00 0.18 -0.22 0.00 0.02 0.00 -0.08 0.07 -0.15 -0.03 . . .

PTAs statistics and distribution by indexes and traits

nm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 1.05
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.6
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

cm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 1.67
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

gm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 1.89
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mil

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -8.35
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fat

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -0.09
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

pro

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.47
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

scs

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 0.08
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.95

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

pl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): -0.04
  • Slope (b): 0.95
  • R-squared (R²): 0.94

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

liv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 0.02
  • Slope (b): 0.96
  • R-squared (R²): 0.95

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

hlv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 0.01
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

dpr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 0.07
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

hcr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): -0.1
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.95

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

ccr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): 0.09
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.94

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

efc

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.94
  • Intercept (a): 0.13
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.89

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

gl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -0.02
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 1

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mfv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.95
  • Intercept (a): 0.01
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.9

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

dpa

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.96
  • Intercept (a): 0.04
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.92

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

ket

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.95
  • Intercept (a): 0.07
  • Slope (b): 1.04
  • R-squared (R²): 0.9

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mas

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.92
  • Intercept (a): -0.09
  • Slope (b): 0.91
  • R-squared (R²): 0.85

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

met

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.87
  • Intercept (a): -0.06
  • Slope (b): 0.92
  • R-squared (R²): 0.76

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

rpl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.87
  • Intercept (a): 0
  • Slope (b): 0.96
  • R-squared (R²): 0.76

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fs

No data available for the comparison.

rfi

No data available for the comparison.

mspd

No data available for the comparison.

BS

Number of AI bulls in file format38 for breed BS: 145

Statistics PTAs evaluation 2512 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2512 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 158 129 170 152 131 5.0 10.3 3.0 -0.1 0.5 . -0.1 -0.1 -0.5 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.2 -0.3 -0.1 . . .
sd 205 194 211 215 701 25.6 21.2 0.2 1.5 1.8 . 2.3 2.1 2.1 4.3 1.6 0.2 0.3 0.4 1.6 0.7 0.4 . . .
min -555 -509 -577 -494 -1146 -59.0 -44.0 2.6 -3.7 -4.5 . -3.6 -5.8 -5.7 -9.0 -3.2 -0.8 -0.8 -1.1 -4.3 -2.3 -0.9 . . .
max 513 488 541 557 2181 51.0 46.0 3.4 2.7 3.5 . 4.8 3.7 3.9 7.6 4.5 0.2 0.7 0.6 2.5 0.7 0.8 . . .
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2508 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2508 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 158 131 169 153 80 2.3 8.1 3.04 0.11 0.45 . 0.24 -0.18 -0.22 0.14 0.59 -0.03 -0.05 -0.1 0.12 -0.21 0.00 . . .
sd 211 199 217 219 706 24.9 20.1 0.18 1.46 1.72 . 2.32 2.00 2.00 4.14 1.64 0.23 0.32 0.4 1.59 0.65 0.39 . . .
min -546 -500 -569 -489 -1160 -59.0 -44.0 2.64 -3.00 -3.80 . -3.10 -5.80 -5.40 -8.90 -3.20 -0.80 -0.90 -1.0 -4.30 -1.80 -0.80 . . .
max 522 501 550 571 2213 42.0 49.0 3.43 2.80 3.10 . 4.80 3.40 3.90 7.60 4.50 0.20 0.70 0.6 2.30 0.70 0.70 . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508 for AI bulls.
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 0 -2 1 -2 25 1.3 1.1 -0.01 -0.17 0.02 . -0.22 0.09 -0.17 0.09 0.01 0.02 -0.00 0.00 0.03 -0.03 -0.05 . . .
sd 43 43 44 46 117 7.1 4.4 0.04 0.56 0.65 . 0.56 0.52 0.67 1.16 0.04 0.06 0.05 0.16 0.26 0.16 0.14 . . .
min -219 -221 -219 -248 -280 -26.0 -9.0 -0.13 -1.60 -1.60 . -2.40 -2.30 -1.90 -2.60 0.00 -0.10 -0.10 -0.50 -0.60 -0.50 -0.40 . . .
max 122 172 127 127 277 13.0 10.0 0.08 1.00 1.90 . 0.80 0.70 1.00 3.20 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.70 0.20 0.30 . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508, by AI bulls’ status.
Status No.  nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
A 28 7 5 8 5 21 1.4 1.1 -0.01 -0.10 -0.04 . -0.20 0.04 -0.18 -0.05 0.01 0.02 -0.00 -0.01 0.01 -0.01 -0.04 . . .
F 11 -13 -13 -12 -15 47 0.8 1.0 0.00 -0.62 0.47 . -0.35 0.42 -0.12 1.10 0.00 -0.03 0.00 0.05 0.17 -0.12 -0.08 . . .
G 106 -1 -2 0 -2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508, by AI bulls’ year of birth.
Year No.  nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
2024 13 -12 -14 -12 -14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2023 36 11 9 11 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2022 26 -8 -10 -7 -7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 21 -25 -28 -24 -30 -280 -26.0 -8.0 0.00 -0.10 0.60 . -0.90 0.40 -0.40 -1.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 -0.20 -0.30 . . .
2020 12 2 6 1 -1 13 0.4 0.1 0.00 -0.57 0.19 . -0.41 0.26 -0.50 0.31 0.00 0.00 -0.03 -0.13 0.10 -0.09 -0.04 . . .
2019 9 36 34 37 35 97 8.5 3.2 -0.04 -0.20 -0.30 . -0.12 -0.40 -0.33 0.25 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.08 . . .
2018 12 14 10 15 12 47 2.4 2.1 -0.02 -0.05 0.08 . -0.11 0.23 0.12 -0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.04 -0.05 -0.11 . . .
2017 4 12 8 13 13 4 2.0 1.5 0.01 -0.30 -0.30 . -0.25 -0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.15 0.05 0.10 -0.05 . . .
2016 3 -16 -16 -16 -13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 4 12 14 13 7 68 2.5 1.5 -0.02 0.35 0.20 . -0.40 0.05 -0.60 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.15 -0.20 -0.05 0.05 . . .

PTAs statistics and distribution by indexes and traits

nm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 7.53
  • Slope (b): 0.95
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 4.93
  • Slope (b): 0.95
  • R-squared (R²): 0.95

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

cm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 8.79
  • Slope (b): 0.95
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

gm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 4.23
  • Slope (b): 0.96
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mil

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 26.99
  • Slope (b): 0.97
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fat

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.96
  • Intercept (a): 1.43
  • Slope (b): 0.95
  • R-squared (R²): 0.92

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

pro

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 1.1
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.95

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

scs

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -0.09
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

pl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.93
  • Intercept (a): -0.16
  • Slope (b): 0.96
  • R-squared (R²): 0.86

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

liv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.94
  • Intercept (a): 0.03
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.87

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

hlv

No data available for the comparison.

dpr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): -0.22
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.94

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

hcr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): 0.1
  • Slope (b): 1.03
  • R-squared (R²): 0.94

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

ccr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.95
  • Intercept (a): -0.18
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.9

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

efc

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.96
  • Intercept (a): 0.09
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.93

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

gl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): 0.01
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 1

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mfv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): 0.01
  • Slope (b): 0.92
  • R-squared (R²): 0.94

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

dpa

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

ket

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.93
  • Intercept (a): 0
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.87

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mas

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.03
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

met

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): -0.02
  • Slope (b): 1.03
  • R-squared (R²): 0.95

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

rpl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.94
  • Intercept (a): -0.05
  • Slope (b): 0.92
  • R-squared (R²): 0.87

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fs

No data available for the comparison.

rfi

No data available for the comparison.

mspd

No data available for the comparison.

GU

Number of AI bulls in file format38 for breed GU: 68

Statistics PTAs evaluation 2512 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2512 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 7 -2 11 -1 -158 0.1 -0.7 3.0 0.3 0.4 . -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 0.4 0.3 . . . . . . . . .
sd 173 173 174 182 636 16.7 16.4 0.2 1.5 1.6 . 1.8 2.1 2.5 4.4 1.4 . . . . . . . . .
min -405 -384 -414 -332 -1425 -23.0 -24.0 2.6 -3.6 -3.5 . -3.3 -4.1 -4.1 -6.0 -2.8 . . . . . . . . .
max 466 418 489 459 1214 33.0 41.0 3.2 3.2 3.4 . 3.7 3.6 4.0 13.5 2.8 . . . . . . . . .
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2508 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2508 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 15 5 19 8 -108 2.8 2.0 2.96 0.25 0.26 . -0.09 0.16 0.07 0.46 0.18 . . . . . . . . .
sd 173 171 174 182 643 16.3 16.1 0.14 1.32 1.80 . 1.74 1.92 2.22 4.71 1.39 . . . . . . . . .
min -397 -378 -406 -409 -1238 -27.0 -22.0 2.65 -2.20 -3.60 . -3.20 -3.60 -3.40 -5.90 -2.80 . . . . . . . . .
max 429 381 452 420 1168 30.0 40.0 3.16 3.00 3.60 . 3.80 3.50 4.20 13.50 2.30 . . . . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508 for AI bulls.
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean -8 -7 -9 -9 -20 -0.4 -0.7 0.02 0.01 -0.08 . 0.04 -0.06 -0.01 0.18 0.10 . . . . . . . . .
sd 42 42 42 40 115 4.6 4.2 0.05 0.51 0.34 . 0.48 0.34 0.62 0.94 0.42 . . . . . . . . .
min -162 -140 -172 -155 -318 -11.0 -15.0 -0.07 -1.40 -1.00 . -0.90 -1.00 -1.20 -2.50 0.00 . . . . . . . . .
max 89 82 92 83 212 8.0 4.0 0.13 0.80 0.40 . 0.90 0.50 1.10 1.50 1.90 . . . . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508, by AI bulls’ status.
Status No.  nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
A 20 -11 -10 -12 -12 -20 -0.4 -0.7 0.02 0.01 -0.08 . 0.04 -0.06 -0.01 0.18 0.10 . . . . . . . . .
G 48 -7 -6 -7 -8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508, by AI bulls’ year of birth.
Year No.  nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
2024 5 -14 -9 -16 -10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2023 11 -7 -6 -7 -9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2022 15 -9 -7 -10 -9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 11 -23 -18 -25 -24 -318 -11.0 -15.0 0.13 -0.40 -0.70 . 0.20 0.20 0.60 0.70 0.20 . . . . . . . . .
2020 10 -9 -11 -9 -6 -37 -2.2 -1.6 0.02 0.08 -0.26 . 0.48 0.10 0.52 0.62 0.00 . . . . . . . . .
2019 5 5 2 6 -5 14 0.0 0.5 0.04 0.30 -0.03 . -0.40 -0.55 -0.55 0.08 0.00 . . . . . . . . .
2018 4 -4 -11 -2 -7 14 2.7 2.7 0.00 -0.53 0.07 . -0.10 -0.07 -0.33 0.10 0.63 . . . . . . . . .
2017 2 -26 -25 -26 -26 -74 -1.5 -2.5 0.00 -0.15 -0.05 . -0.15 -0.05 -0.15 -1.25 0.00 . . . . . . . . .
2015 3 33 33 32 32 56 3.0 1.3 -0.01 0.20 0.10 . 0.07 0.17 0.10 0.43 0.00 . . . . . . . . .

PTAs statistics and distribution by indexes and traits

nm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): -7.77
  • Slope (b): 0.97
  • R-squared (R²): 0.94

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): -7.22
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.94

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

cm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): -8.01
  • Slope (b): 0.97
  • R-squared (R²): 0.94

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

gm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -8.72
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.95

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mil

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -17.36
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fat

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.96
  • Intercept (a): -0.43
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.93

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

pro

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): -0.7
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.94

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

scs

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.95
  • Intercept (a): -0.31
  • Slope (b): 1.11
  • R-squared (R²): 0.9

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

pl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.95
  • Intercept (a): -0.03
  • Slope (b): 1.14
  • R-squared (R²): 0.91

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

liv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -0.06
  • Slope (b): 0.92
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

hlv

No data available for the comparison.

dpr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): 0.04
  • Slope (b): 1.03
  • R-squared (R²): 0.93

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

hcr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.07
  • Slope (b): 1.06
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

ccr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): -0.02
  • Slope (b): 1.08
  • R-squared (R²): 0.94

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

efc

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 0.21
  • Slope (b): 0.93
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

gl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.95
  • Intercept (a): 0.11
  • Slope (b): 0.96
  • R-squared (R²): 0.91

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mfv

No data available for the comparison.

dpa

No data available for the comparison.

ket

No data available for the comparison.

mas

No data available for the comparison.

met

No data available for the comparison.

rpl

No data available for the comparison.

fs

No data available for the comparison.

rfi

No data available for the comparison.

mspd

No data available for the comparison.

AY

Number of AI bulls in file format38 for breed AY: 82

Statistics PTAs evaluation 2512 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2512 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 378 356 388 391 1023 46.1 41.5 3.0 1.2 1.8 . 2.0 3.7 1.9 16.5 -0.9 . . . . . . . . .
sd 372 353 382 385 998 38.2 33.6 0.2 2.4 2.5 . 2.7 3.6 2.8 12.0 2.0 . . . . . . . . .
min -332 -322 -336 -266 -1242 -36.0 -34.0 2.6 -4.0 -3.3 . -2.7 -2.4 -2.4 -4.5 -5.9 . . . . . . . . .
max 1119 1064 1143 1161 2980 99.0 95.0 3.3 7.2 6.0 . 7.1 10.2 7.1 32.2 2.3 . . . . . . . . .
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2508 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2508 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 374 351 384 387 992 44.6 40.6 2.94 1.13 1.78 . 1.86 3.60 1.74 15.99 -0.83 . . . . . . . . .
sd 367 346 377 380 961 37.5 32.7 0.16 2.29 2.43 . 2.69 3.57 2.79 11.96 1.96 . . . . . . . . .
min -276 -279 -274 -251 -1279 -35.0 -35.0 2.56 -3.80 -3.20 . -3.00 -2.50 -2.70 -5.00 -5.90 . . . . . . . . .
max 1139 1055 1173 1206 2972 105.0 95.0 3.33 7.20 5.90 . 7.10 10.20 7.30 31.80 2.30 . . . . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508 for AI bulls.
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 4 5 3 4 2 -0.2 -0.2 0.00 -0.05 -0.02 . 0.06 -0.00 0.06 0.33 0.01 . . . . . . . . .
sd 38 35 39 36 125 3.2 4.6 0.02 0.42 0.33 . 0.48 0.19 0.44 0.78 0.02 . . . . . . . . .
min -128 -130 -127 -99 -248 -10.0 -10.0 -0.05 -1.80 -1.30 . -1.60 -0.40 -0.90 -1.10 0.00 . . . . . . . . .
max 128 117 131 128 484 10.0 20.0 0.05 0.80 0.30 . 1.20 0.60 1.20 2.60 0.10 . . . . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508, by AI bulls’ status.
Status No.  nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
A 23 -7 -7 -8 -6 -20 0.0 -0.6 0.01 -0.09 -0.03 . 0.02 0.01 0.06 0.24 0.01 . . . . . . . . .
F 19 9 12 8 10 59 -0.6 1.0 -0.00 0.06 -0.01 . 0.16 -0.03 0.07 0.58 0.00 . . . . . . . . .
G 40 8 9 8 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508, by AI bulls’ year of birth.
Year No.  nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
2024 5 2 5 0 -2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2023 16 20 20 19 19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2022 9 1 3 0 -0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 6 4 -2 6 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020 5 -15 -9 -18 -17 1 3.0 -2.0 0.03 -0.25 -0.05 . -0.20 -0.05 0.05 -0.10 0.00 . . . . . . . . .
2019 3 15 24 10 15 -236 -2.0 -7.0 0.01 0.80 0.10 . 0.90 0.60 1.20 -0.40 0.00 . . . . . . . . .
2018 5 -25 -28 -24 -15 -88 -2.8 -1.5 0.02 -0.78 -0.27 . 0.10 0.12 0.28 1.15 0.03 . . . . . . . . .
2017 5 -1 2 -3 -4 -10 1.0 1.5 0.03 -0.05 -0.05 . 0.05 -0.10 -0.15 -0.25 0.00 . . . . . . . . .
2016 2 14 14 13 12 37 1.0 0.0 -0.05 0.00 0.10 . -0.70 0.00 -0.80 -0.70 0.00 . . . . . . . . .
2015 5 1 8 -2 -3 -1 1.2 -2.8 -0.00 0.08 0.05 . -0.03 -0.18 -0.20 0.25 0.00 . . . . . . . . .

PTAs statistics and distribution by indexes and traits

nm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.56
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): 0.38
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

cm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.58
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

gm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -0.38
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mil

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -29.55
  • Slope (b): 1.03
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fat

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -0.15
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

pro

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.77
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

scs

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

pl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -0.06
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

liv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.05
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

hlv

No data available for the comparison.

dpr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 0.12
  • Slope (b): 0.97
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

hcr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 1

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

ccr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.12
  • Slope (b): 0.97
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

efc

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): 0.14
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 1

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

gl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): 0.01
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 1

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mfv

No data available for the comparison.

dpa

No data available for the comparison.

ket

No data available for the comparison.

mas

No data available for the comparison.

met

No data available for the comparison.

rpl

No data available for the comparison.

fs

No data available for the comparison.

rfi

No data available for the comparison.

mspd

No data available for the comparison.

XD

Number of AI bulls in file format38 for breed XD: 63

Statistics PTAs evaluation 2512 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2512 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 680 650 693 674 1713 79.2 53.4 3.0 -0.1 -1.3 2.1 -1.4 1.3 -0.8 5.9 -1.8 0.3 0.1 0.6 -1.2 -0.7 -0.4 . . .
sd 350 367 344 323 414 6.9 8.8 0.2 1.8 1.4 0.4 1.4 2.2 1.7 1.7 0.9 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.4 1.9 0.5 . . .
min -470 -584 -428 -375 1027 68.0 38.0 2.8 -2.0 -2.8 1.4 -2.7 -1.3 -2.6 4.5 -3.3 0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -4.0 -4.6 -0.8 . . .
max 1116 1085 1129 1107 2258 89.0 63.0 3.2 3.0 0.9 2.7 0.7 3.7 2.0 9.6 -0.7 0.4 0.4 1.1 0.7 1.0 0.6 . . .
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2508 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2508 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 679 652 691 671 1719 79.8 54.3 3.01 -0.65 -1.53 2.15 -1.60 0.53 -0.88 4.55 -1.97 0.25 0.13 0.68 -1.25 -0.28 -0.22 . . .
sd 341 359 335 314 439 5.9 10.1 0.13 1.65 1.02 0.43 1.15 2.75 1.84 1.06 0.97 0.05 0.27 0.48 0.64 1.32 0.59 . . .
min -457 -582 -405 -352 995 73.0 36.0 2.85 -2.00 -2.60 1.40 -3.00 -2.20 -2.70 3.50 -3.30 0.20 -0.30 -0.20 -2.00 -2.70 -0.80 . . .
max 1111 1088 1121 1110 2324 89.0 64.0 3.19 2.40 0.10 2.70 0.20 4.30 1.40 6.50 -0.80 0.30 0.40 1.10 -0.30 0.90 0.60 . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508 for AI bulls.
Stat nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
mean 0 -2 1 3 -43 2.0 -1.3 -0.01 0.13 0.10 0.07 0.05 0.28 0.05 1.53 -0.05 0.02 0.00 -0.07 0.20 -0.30 -0.07 . . .
sd 45 43 46 43 67 4.4 2.3 0.02 0.71 0.28 0.14 0.43 0.64 0.44 0.84 0.08 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.11 0.79 0.16 . . .
min -87 -94 -84 -81 -140 -2.0 -5.0 -0.05 -1.20 -0.30 -0.10 -0.60 -0.80 -0.70 0.80 -0.20 0.00 -0.10 -0.20 0.00 -1.90 -0.40 . . .
max 140 135 142 159 32 9.0 2.0 0.01 0.70 0.30 0.30 0.50 0.90 0.60 3.10 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.30 0.10 0.00 . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508, by AI bulls’ status.
Status No.  nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
A 6 15 15 16 14 -43 2.0 -1.3 -0.01 0.13 0.10 0.07 0.05 0.28 0.05 1.53 -0.05 0.02 0.00 -0.07 0.20 -0.30 -0.07 . . .
F 5 -24 -27 -23 -19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
G 52 1 -2 2 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2512 and 2508, by AI bulls’ year of birth.
Year No.  nm
($)
fm
($)
cm
($)
gm
($)
mil
(lb)
fat
(lb)
pro
(lb)
scs
(log2)
pl
(mo)
liv
(%)
hlv
(%)
dpr
(%)
hcr
(%)
ccr
(%)
efc
(d)
gl
(d)
mfv
(%)
dpa
(%)
ket
(%)
mas
(%)
met
(%)
rpl
(%)
fs
(lb)
rfi
(lb)
mspd
(lb/min)
2024 10 -31 -31 -30 -26 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2023 24 31 25 33 29 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2022 13 -19 -20 -19 -9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 2 -48 -41 -51 -50 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020 6 18 17 18 15 -39 2.6 -1.2 -0.02 0.40 0.18 0.02 0.06 0.26 0.08 1.62 -0.06 0.02 0.00 -0.04 0.24 0.02 0.00 . . .
2018 1 -3 -3 -3 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2017 2 -8 -9 -8 -7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016 1 -54 -54 -55 -39 -66 -1.0 -2.0 0.01 -1.20 -0.30 0.30 0.00 0.40 -0.10 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.20 0.00 -1.90 -0.40 . . .
2015 3 -34 -39 -32 -31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PTAs statistics and distribution by indexes and traits

nm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -10.43
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -11.76
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

cm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -10.2
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

gm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -8.24
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mil

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 99.98
  • Slope (b): 0.92
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fat

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.7
  • Intercept (a): 31.22
  • Slope (b): 0.63
  • R-squared (R²): 0.49

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

pro

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 6.34
  • Slope (b): 0.86
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

scs

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.22
  • Slope (b): 1.07
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

pl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.91
  • Intercept (a): 0.05
  • Slope (b): 0.88
  • R-squared (R²): 0.82

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

liv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 0.31
  • Slope (b): 1.14
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

hlv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.95
  • Intercept (a): 0.16
  • Slope (b): 0.96
  • R-squared (R²): 0.9

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

dpr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.94
  • Intercept (a): 0.04
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.87

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

hcr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.39
  • Slope (b): 0.8
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

ccr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): 0.01
  • Slope (b): 0.95
  • R-squared (R²): 0.94

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

efc

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -1.86
  • Slope (b): 1.75
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

gl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -0.12
  • Slope (b): 0.96
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mfv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.89
  • Intercept (a): -0.07
  • Slope (b): 1.33
  • R-squared (R²): 0.8

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

dpa

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): 0.02
  • Slope (b): 0.89
  • R-squared (R²): 0.95

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

ket

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.02
  • Slope (b): 0.92
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

mas

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.28
  • Slope (b): 1.06
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

met

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.14
  • Slope (b): 1.55
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

rpl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2512 ~ a + b * 2508)

  • Correlation (r): 0.96
  • Intercept (a): -0.1
  • Slope (b): 0.86
  • R-squared (R²): 0.93

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2512) by AI status

fs

No data available for the comparison.

rfi

No data available for the comparison.

mspd

No data available for the comparison.

 

Haplotypes check

No haplotype check when investigating traditional evaluation results.