CDCB Logo

Introduction

This report compares Predicted Transmitting Abilities (PTAs) for AI bulls between the 2608 and 2604 genomic/DERT evaluations across all indices and traits defined in File38. Changes are quantified overall and by bull category. Analyses are restricted to bulls present in both File38 and to records with complete (non-missing) values for the specified traits in both the current and previous evaluation. The report also checks haplotype status for all evaluated animals, highlighting any discrepancies between the two evaluations.

NAAB breed code changes

No breed code changes.

 

PTAs check

Statistics by breed

HO

Number of AI bulls in file format38 for breed HO: 5367

Statistics PTAs evaluation 2608 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2608 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
mean 523 475 544 530 658 58.2 32.9 2.9 2.1 -0.4 0.1 0.5 0.7 1.5 1.8 -0.5 -0.1 0.0 0.1 1.3 0.9 0.1 32 -9 7.0 -0.4 -0.6 41.2
sd 396 374 407 408 635 42.4 21.2 0.1 1.9 2.0 0.5 1.2 1.3 1.8 2.6 1.2 0.1 0.5 0.8 1.5 1.0 0.5 193 88 0.3 0.9 1.2 52.2
min -1374 -1387 -1368 -1396 -2980 -137.0 -99.0 2.4 -6.4 -10.1 -2.6 -5.1 -5.5 -6.6 -16.5 -4.8 -0.6 -4.8 -4.1 -6.1 -4.3 -2.7 -686 -353 5.9 -8.4 -10.4 -174.0
max 1278 1211 1319 1275 2763 159.0 96.0 3.5 7.4 6.1 1.9 5.6 5.0 8.8 8.2 6.4 0.4 1.4 2.6 6.0 3.8 2.4 647 346 8.0 5.7 22.1 234.0
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2604 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2604 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
mean 526 478 547 504 675 59.4 33.6 2.89 2.24 -0.28 0.21 -0.69 0.81 0.08 2.06 -0.46 -0.04 -0.02 0.13 1.19 0.89 0.04 28 -12 7.01 . . .
sd 395 373 406 394 633 42.7 21.4 0.14 1.94 2.02 0.47 1.32 1.41 1.60 2.70 1.18 0.12 0.49 0.80 1.49 0.99 0.51 193 86 0.27 . . .
min -1362 -1375 -1356 -1326 -3008 -138.0 -100.0 2.45 -6.20 -10.10 -2.00 -6.40 -5.60 -7.40 -16.60 -4.80 -0.60 -4.40 -3.70 -6.10 -4.40 -2.20 -705 -359 5.78 . . .
max 1291 1248 1310 1259 2779 158.0 92.0 3.54 7.20 6.30 2.50 7.00 6.00 6.90 9.50 6.40 0.40 1.40 2.50 5.80 3.70 2.30 657 320 7.90 . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2608 and 2604 for AI bulls.
Stat nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
mean -4 -3 -4 26 -18 -1.2 -0.7 -0.00 -0.18 -0.15 -0.15 1.22 -0.14 1.38 -0.27 -0.00 -0.01 0.00 -0.08 0.06 0.01 0.01 4 3 0.02 . . .
sd 26 27 26 33 84 2.9 2.2 0.02 0.28 0.24 0.20 0.85 0.52 0.89 0.72 0.05 0.05 0.09 0.14 0.21 0.16 0.12 22 14 0.05 . . .
min -182 -189 -179 -156 -824 -25.0 -22.0 -0.11 -1.40 -2.00 -1.20 -5.50 -3.30 -5.30 -3.10 -0.90 -0.20 -1.10 -1.20 -1.00 -1.00 -1.00 -83 -167 -0.31 . . .
max 267 276 262 322 794 30.0 17.0 0.11 1.00 0.80 0.70 3.40 1.80 3.60 3.10 0.50 0.10 0.30 0.40 1.40 0.90 0.50 150 83 0.33 . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2608 and 2604, by AI bulls’ status.
Status No.  nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
A 725 -1 0 -1 26 -7 -1.2 -0.5 -0.00 -0.11 -0.12 -0.15 1.16 -0.16 1.31 -0.21 -0.00 -0.01 -0.01 -0.06 0.05 0.00 0.01 4 2 0.02 . . .
F 545 -4 -4 -4 -1 2 -0.2 -0.0 -0.00 -0.04 -0.04 -0.27 0.04 -0.02 0.18 -0.14 -0.00 0.00 -0.01 -0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1 0.00 . . .
G 4097 -4 -4 -4 29 -22 -1.4 -0.9 -0.00 -0.21 -0.18 -0.13 1.39 -0.15 1.55 -0.29 -0.00 -0.02 0.01 -0.09 0.07 0.01 0.01 5 3 0.02 . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2608 and 2604, by AI bulls’ year of birth.
Year No.  nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
2025 260 -8 -8 -8 33 -49 -2.0 -1.5 -0.00 -0.29 -0.27 -0.07 1.77 -0.23 1.90 -0.27 0.00 -0.02 0.04 -0.14 0.16 0.05 0.01 6 5 0.03 . . .
2024 1207 -5 -4 -5 31 -26 -1.6 -1.0 -0.00 -0.25 -0.18 -0.12 1.48 -0.14 1.65 -0.38 -0.01 -0.02 0.01 -0.10 0.07 0.00 0.01 10 2 0.02 . . .
2023 1368 -5 -5 -5 30 -33 -1.6 -1.0 -0.00 -0.19 -0.19 -0.12 1.51 -0.19 1.66 -0.27 -0.00 -0.01 0.01 -0.11 0.09 0.02 0.01 2 4 0.02 . . .
2022 825 -3 -1 -3 29 -3 -1.0 -0.5 -0.00 -0.22 -0.19 -0.12 1.32 -0.15 1.48 -0.26 -0.00 -0.02 0.00 -0.09 0.04 -0.00 0.00 4 2 0.02 . . .
2021 570 -0 0 -0 26 -7 -1.0 -0.4 -0.01 -0.12 -0.11 -0.17 1.10 -0.09 1.27 -0.19 -0.01 -0.00 -0.00 -0.05 0.04 0.01 0.01 3 2 0.01 . . .
2020 346 1 3 1 27 4 -0.9 -0.4 -0.00 -0.12 -0.08 -0.13 1.06 -0.15 1.22 -0.24 -0.00 -0.01 -0.01 -0.05 0.04 0.00 0.01 4 0 0.02 . . .
2019 225 -1 -1 -1 19 -8 -0.8 -0.4 -0.00 -0.08 -0.07 -0.21 0.89 -0.08 1.01 -0.19 -0.00 0.01 0.01 -0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 1 2 0.01 . . .
2018 133 -0 0 -0 16 -2 -0.5 -0.2 -0.00 -0.05 -0.10 -0.21 0.65 0.02 0.78 -0.10 -0.00 0.00 -0.01 0.01 -0.01 0.02 0.02 2 -0 0.00 . . .
2017 136 -1 -1 -1 10 -1 -0.2 -0.1 -0.00 -0.06 -0.06 -0.26 0.44 0.01 0.59 -0.09 -0.00 -0.00 -0.01 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.01 -0 2 0.00 . . .
2016 52 -5 -5 -5 -3 -3 -0.3 -0.1 -0.00 -0.01 -0.02 -0.32 0.02 -0.03 0.14 -0.10 -0.01 0.00 -0.02 0.00 -0.00 -0.01 0.00 0 1 -0.01 . . .

PTAs statistics and distribution by indexes and traits

nm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -3.86
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 1

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

fm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -3.71
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

cm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -3.89
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 1

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

gm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): 7.97
  • Slope (b): 1.04
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

mil

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -14.37
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

fat

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -0.74
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 1

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

pro

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.27
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

scs

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

pl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.07
  • Slope (b): 0.95
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

liv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.16
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

hlv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.92
  • Intercept (a): -0.13
  • Slope (b): 0.93
  • R-squared (R²): 0.84

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

dpr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.78
  • Intercept (a): 1.02
  • Slope (b): 0.71
  • R-squared (R²): 0.61

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

hcr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.93
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 0.84
  • R-squared (R²): 0.86

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

ccr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.87
  • Intercept (a): 1.38
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.76

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

efc

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.96
  • Intercept (a): -0.12
  • Slope (b): 0.93
  • R-squared (R²): 0.93

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

gl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 1

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

mfv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.92
  • Intercept (a): -0.02
  • Slope (b): 0.95
  • R-squared (R²): 0.84

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

dpa

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.01
  • Slope (b): 1.07
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

ket

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.08
  • Slope (b): 1.03
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

mas

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.05
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

met

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

rpl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 0.01
  • Slope (b): 1.05
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

fs

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 4.11
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

rfi

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 2.58
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

mspd

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -0.07
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

dia

No data available for the comparison.

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

rsp

No data available for the comparison.

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

fsc

No data available for the comparison.

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

JE

Number of AI bulls in file format38 for breed JE: 679

Statistics PTAs evaluation 2608 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2608 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
mean 234 205 247 227 187 24.8 14.1 3.0 1.7 -0.1 -0.2 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 -0.8 0.3 0.1 . . . -0.3 -0.6 16.3
sd 308 300 312 313 798 30.6 23.7 0.1 2.0 1.5 0.7 1.5 1.4 2.0 2.6 1.2 0.2 0.3 0.7 1.7 0.6 0.2 . . . 1.1 1.2 58.0
min -1010 -955 -1036 -1097 -2583 -96.0 -79.0 2.6 -4.5 -5.4 -2.9 -4.4 -4.1 -7.3 -13.6 -4.5 -0.6 -1.3 -2.7 -8.1 -1.5 -0.9 . . . -6.6 -5.2 -180.0
max 668 637 683 700 2514 75.0 70.0 3.5 6.7 4.3 1.7 5.6 4.3 5.7 9.3 3.0 0.6 0.9 3.0 4.1 2.2 0.8 . . . 3.0 4.7 154.0
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2604 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2604 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
mean 240 209 253 216 198 25.4 14.6 2.95 1.83 -0.05 0.03 -0.35 0.18 -0.03 0.36 0.13 0.05 0.16 0.12 -0.59 0.31 0.11 . . . . . .
sd 306 298 311 294 811 31.1 24.3 0.14 2.04 1.39 0.58 1.74 1.47 1.76 2.25 1.15 0.19 0.32 0.69 1.62 0.52 0.23 . . . . . .
min -979 -923 -1006 -1041 -2590 -97.0 -80.0 2.56 -4.40 -5.10 -1.90 -5.40 -4.20 -6.00 -10.10 -4.50 -0.60 -1.30 -2.70 -7.50 -1.70 -0.90 . . . . . .
max 655 639 673 650 2484 77.0 70.0 3.46 6.20 4.20 1.80 7.70 4.90 5.30 6.40 3.00 0.50 1.00 2.90 4.30 1.90 0.60 . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2608 and 2604 for AI bulls.
Stat nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
mean -5 -5 -6 11 -11 -0.5 -0.5 0.01 -0.16 -0.09 -0.21 0.79 0.06 0.59 0.18 -0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 -0.20 0.03 0.02 . . . . . .
sd 25 25 25 42 52 2.2 1.7 0.02 0.35 0.24 0.21 1.35 0.60 1.35 1.16 0.07 0.07 0.09 0.12 0.35 0.15 0.08 . . . . . .
min -119 -102 -126 -162 -288 -10.0 -11.0 -0.04 -1.60 -1.10 -1.10 -5.10 -1.70 -4.30 -3.60 -0.30 -0.40 -0.60 -1.10 -2.10 -0.80 -0.20 . . . . . .
max 75 76 75 129 190 9.0 6.0 0.10 1.10 0.80 0.90 3.20 1.90 3.50 5.70 0.30 0.20 0.30 0.30 1.60 0.80 0.40 . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2608 and 2604, by AI bulls’ status.
Status No.  nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
A 116 -2 -1 -2 13 -10 -0.4 -0.4 0.01 -0.08 -0.06 -0.21 0.80 -0.04 0.51 0.16 -0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 -0.19 0.03 0.03 . . . . . .
F 24 -30 -29 -32 -69 -4 -0.8 -0.5 0.01 -0.18 0.03 -0.00 -2.28 0.25 -1.54 1.76 -0.01 0.03 0.00 -0.05 -0.07 -0.03 0.01 . . . . . .
G 539 -5 -4 -6 15 -11 -0.5 -0.5 0.01 -0.18 -0.10 -0.22 0.93 0.08 0.70 0.11 -0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 -0.20 0.03 0.02 . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2608 and 2604, by AI bulls’ year of birth.
Year No.  nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
2025 35 -9 -8 -9 21 -35 -1.1 -1.2 0.01 -0.32 -0.08 -0.14 1.31 0.20 1.17 0.34 -0.02 0.02 0.03 0.05 -0.19 0.06 0.02 . . . . . .
2024 181 -3 -2 -4 20 -12 -0.6 -0.7 0.01 -0.16 -0.05 -0.21 1.13 0.11 0.88 0.07 -0.00 0.03 0.03 0.04 -0.19 0.06 0.03 . . . . . .
2023 155 -7 -6 -7 14 -14 -0.4 -0.6 0.01 -0.23 -0.14 -0.24 0.94 0.01 0.70 0.26 0.00 -0.00 -0.02 0.01 -0.27 -0.01 0.00 . . . . . .
2022 124 -6 -5 -7 9 -6 -0.7 -0.4 0.01 -0.15 -0.09 -0.23 0.75 0.06 0.48 -0.11 -0.01 0.02 0.03 0.03 -0.22 0.02 0.02 . . . . . .
2021 55 -3 -3 -3 17 -11 -0.1 -0.3 0.01 -0.17 -0.16 -0.19 0.93 0.05 0.82 0.37 -0.01 -0.01 -0.01 0.02 -0.26 0.05 0.02 . . . . . .
2020 43 -3 -2 -4 4 -16 -0.6 -0.6 0.01 -0.02 -0.04 -0.16 0.37 0.04 0.27 0.26 -0.01 0.02 0.02 -0.01 -0.19 0.07 0.01 . . . . . .
2019 26 -0 -1 -0 8 9 0.0 0.3 0.00 -0.10 -0.07 -0.21 0.43 0.00 0.17 0.28 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.02 -0.04 -0.03 0.04 . . . . . .
2018 12 -5 -5 -5 -5 -15 -0.6 -0.4 -0.00 0.02 0.02 -0.25 0.12 0.00 -0.16 0.23 -0.01 0.01 -0.02 0.02 0.00 -0.04 0.00 . . . . . .
2017 27 -11 -11 -11 -19 1 0.1 0.0 0.00 -0.14 -0.05 -0.24 -0.47 0.11 -0.51 0.43 -0.01 0.03 0.01 0.03 -0.01 0.03 0.03 . . . . . .
2016 11 -11 -10 -12 -26 12 -0.2 0.2 0.00 -0.06 0.06 -0.16 -0.75 -0.04 -0.67 1.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 -0.03 -0.10 -0.01 0.02 . . . . . .

PTAs statistics and distribution by indexes and traits

nm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -5.88
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

fm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -5.79
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

cm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -5.85
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

gm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.63
  • Slope (b): 1.06
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

mil

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -7.53
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 1

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

fat

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -0.02
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 1

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

pro

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -0.17
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 1

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

scs

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.11
  • Slope (b): 0.97
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

pl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.1
  • Slope (b): 0.96
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

liv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.08
  • Slope (b): 1.03
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

hlv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.95
  • Intercept (a): -0.22
  • Slope (b): 1.09
  • R-squared (R²): 0.9

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

dpr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.66
  • Intercept (a): 0.63
  • Slope (b): 0.55
  • R-squared (R²): 0.43

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

hcr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.91
  • Intercept (a): 0.09
  • Slope (b): 0.87
  • R-squared (R²): 0.84

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

ccr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.75
  • Intercept (a): 0.58
  • Slope (b): 0.84
  • R-squared (R²): 0.56

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

efc

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.89
  • Intercept (a): 0.17
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.8

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

gl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 1

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

mfv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.95
  • Intercept (a): 0.01
  • Slope (b): 1.05
  • R-squared (R²): 0.9

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

dpa

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.96
  • Intercept (a): 0.02
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.92

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

ket

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.02
  • Slope (b): 1.03
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

mas

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -0.17
  • Slope (b): 1.05
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

met

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): 0.02
  • Slope (b): 1.03
  • R-squared (R²): 0.93

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

rpl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.95
  • Intercept (a): 0.02
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.9

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

fs

No data available for the comparison.

rfi

No data available for the comparison.

mspd

No data available for the comparison.

dia

No data available for the comparison.

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

rsp

No data available for the comparison.

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

fsc

No data available for the comparison.

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

BS

Number of AI bulls in file format38 for breed BS: 164

Statistics PTAs evaluation 2608 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2608 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
mean 255 218 271 234 546 26.3 26.7 2.9 1.4 0.3 . 0.3 0.4 0.1 3.3 -0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.1 -0.2 . . . . . -4.2
sd 269 251 278 273 569 25.5 19.7 0.2 1.8 1.4 . 1.2 1.3 1.7 3.8 1.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 1.1 0.4 0.2 . . . . . 42.8
min -582 -537 -603 -579 -1218 -60.0 -45.0 2.6 -4.6 -4.0 . -2.3 -3.4 -4.7 -8.7 -3.6 -0.2 -0.7 -0.5 -3.6 -1.2 -1.0 . . . . . -112.0
max 771 763 790 759 2306 83.0 65.0 3.4 5.9 3.9 . 2.8 4.3 4.5 10.2 4.2 0.1 0.5 0.6 3.5 0.8 0.6 . . . . . 92.0
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2604 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2604 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
mean 273 237 289 262 554 27.0 26.9 2.94 1.54 0.55 . 1.02 0.65 0.50 2.47 -0.10 -0.01 -0.04 -0.03 0.50 -0.08 -0.18 . . . . . .
sd 271 253 280 279 568 25.6 19.8 0.15 1.91 1.37 . 2.05 1.41 2.01 2.73 1.14 0.05 0.18 0.19 1.04 0.34 0.25 . . . . . .
min -539 -494 -561 -487 -1169 -59.0 -45.0 2.63 -4.10 -4.00 . -3.50 -3.10 -4.10 -6.20 -3.60 -0.30 -0.80 -0.60 -3.90 -1.10 -0.90 . . . . . .
max 780 786 798 804 2345 83.0 64.0 3.38 5.90 4.10 . 6.40 4.40 5.10 9.30 4.20 0.10 0.40 0.60 3.70 0.70 0.60 . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2608 and 2604 for AI bulls.
Stat nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
mean -18 -18 -18 -28 -7 -0.7 -0.2 -0.00 -0.15 -0.21 . -0.69 -0.29 -0.39 0.86 -0.04 -0.00 0.01 0.04 -0.01 -0.01 0.01 . . . . . .
sd 35 35 36 51 77 2.5 2.2 0.02 0.41 0.36 . 1.34 0.54 1.29 1.58 0.22 0.04 0.08 0.07 0.28 0.10 0.09 . . . . . .
min -125 -118 -127 -145 -301 -11.0 -8.0 -0.10 -1.30 -1.60 . -4.80 -2.30 -3.80 -3.20 -2.50 -0.10 -0.70 -0.20 -1.70 -0.30 -0.20 . . . . . .
max 55 52 56 87 294 6.0 8.0 0.04 1.10 0.80 . 1.80 1.30 2.80 4.70 0.30 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.70 0.30 0.30 . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2608 and 2604, by AI bulls’ status.
Status No.  nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
A 31 -2 -2 -1 3 1 0.4 0.3 -0.00 -0.03 -0.26 . 0.02 -0.09 0.36 0.00 -0.01 0.01 0.01 0.04 -0.06 -0.02 0.02 . . . . . .
F 12 -24 -24 -25 -53 42 0.2 1.0 0.01 -0.29 -0.14 . -1.68 -0.28 -1.32 0.48 -0.02 0.00 -0.01 0.03 0.02 -0.05 -0.02 . . . . . .
G 121 -22 -22 -21 -34 -14 -1.1 -0.4 -0.01 -0.17 -0.21 . -0.78 -0.34 -0.49 1.12 -0.05 -0.00 0.01 0.04 0.00 -0.00 0.00 . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2608 and 2604, by AI bulls’ year of birth.
Year No.  nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
2025 5 -21 -23 -21 -40 0 0.0 0.4 -0.01 -0.22 -0.46 . -1.08 -0.44 -0.98 1.28 -0.06 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.08 -0.02 -0.02 . . . . . .
2024 33 -19 -18 -19 -32 1 -1.1 -0.2 -0.01 -0.13 -0.25 . -0.85 -0.24 -0.56 1.88 -0.02 -0.01 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.01 . . . . . .
2023 37 -32 -32 -33 -42 -45 -1.5 -1.5 -0.01 -0.24 -0.08 . -0.68 -0.43 -0.25 0.35 -0.01 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.00 . . . . . .
2022 24 -8 -10 -7 -25 -2 0.1 0.5 -0.01 -0.05 -0.23 . -1.06 -0.21 -0.64 0.92 -0.05 -0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 -0.04 0.00 . . . . . .
2021 19 -26 -28 -25 -29 -34 -2.2 -0.5 -0.00 -0.27 -0.41 . -0.38 -0.36 -0.33 1.77 -0.18 -0.02 -0.04 0.03 -0.09 0.04 0.07 . . . . . .
2020 14 -4 -4 -3 -13 55 0.6 1.7 -0.00 0.06 -0.24 . -0.50 -0.28 -0.14 0.12 0.01 -0.01 0.04 0.04 -0.20 -0.05 -0.01 . . . . . .
2019 8 -1 -2 -0 -2 21 0.1 0.8 -0.02 -0.14 -0.12 . -0.32 -0.06 -0.05 0.38 -0.04 -0.01 0.03 0.03 0.04 -0.09 0.00 . . . . . .
2018 10 -18 -17 -18 -33 22 1.1 0.5 0.01 -0.30 -0.27 . -1.15 -0.31 -0.67 -0.19 -0.02 0.03 0.02 0.08 -0.03 -0.03 0.01 . . . . . .
2017 3 -5 -5 -5 -11 5 -0.7 0.0 -0.00 0.00 -0.03 . -0.50 0.13 0.07 1.53 -0.03 -0.03 0.07 0.07 0.13 0.03 -0.03 . . . . . .
2016 3 -18 -17 -18 -43 26 1.3 0.7 0.01 -0.27 -0.27 . -1.07 -0.07 -2.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 -0.03 . . . . . .

PTAs statistics and distribution by indexes and traits

nm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -13.47
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

fm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -14.32
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

cm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -13.17
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

gm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -18.06
  • Slope (b): 0.96
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

mil

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -3.28
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

fat

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -0.5
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

pro

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.14
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

scs

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.08
  • Slope (b): 1.03
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

pl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -0.07
  • Slope (b): 0.95
  • R-squared (R²): 0.95

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

liv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): -0.21
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.94

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

hlv

No data available for the comparison.

dpr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.77
  • Intercept (a): -0.15
  • Slope (b): 0.47
  • R-squared (R²): 0.6

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

hcr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.92
  • Intercept (a): -0.21
  • Slope (b): 0.88
  • R-squared (R²): 0.86

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

ccr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.77
  • Intercept (a): -0.21
  • Slope (b): 0.64
  • R-squared (R²): 0.59

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

efc

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.94
  • Intercept (a): 0.09
  • Slope (b): 1.31
  • R-squared (R²): 0.88

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

gl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -0.04
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

mfv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.79
  • Intercept (a): 0
  • Slope (b): 0.92
  • R-squared (R²): 0.62

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

dpa

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.91
  • Intercept (a): 0.01
  • Slope (b): 0.95
  • R-squared (R²): 0.83

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

ket

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.94
  • Intercept (a): 0.04
  • Slope (b): 0.89
  • R-squared (R²): 0.88

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

mas

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.93

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

met

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.96
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.93

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

rpl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.93
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 0.9
  • R-squared (R²): 0.87

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

fs

No data available for the comparison.

rfi

No data available for the comparison.

mspd

No data available for the comparison.

dia

No data available for the comparison.

rsp

No data available for the comparison.

fsc

No data available for the comparison.

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

GU

Number of AI bulls in file format38 for breed GU: 70

Statistics PTAs evaluation 2608 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2608 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
mean 88 75 94 81 -26 6.6 2.9 3.0 1.2 0.8 . 0.5 0.4 0.9 1.1 0.2 . . . . . . . . . . . 25.4
sd 219 212 223 233 546 16.3 14.8 0.1 2.4 2.0 . 1.7 1.6 2.5 4.8 1.0 . . . . . . . . . . . 73.0
min -496 -462 -513 -491 -1554 -45.0 -45.0 2.6 -4.5 -3.0 . -2.9 -2.7 -3.8 -7.1 -3.2 . . . . . . . . . . . -111.0
max 594 565 607 621 1137 53.0 37.0 3.3 6.1 6.8 . 4.2 4.3 5.8 17.9 2.1 . . . . . . . . . . . 175.0
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2604 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2604 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
mean 89 75 95 70 -26 7.3 2.9 2.96 1.38 0.79 . 0.20 -0.20 0.33 0.30 0.22 . . . . . . . . . . . .
sd 208 203 211 216 558 17.0 15.5 0.14 2.12 1.86 . 1.56 1.49 2.20 3.19 0.96 . . . . . . . . . . . .
min -450 -414 -467 -418 -1557 -46.0 -45.0 2.60 -3.40 -3.00 . -2.80 -3.00 -4.80 -5.70 -3.10 . . . . . . . . . . . .
max 518 498 533 518 1299 56.0 37.0 3.28 5.30 6.80 . 4.70 3.00 5.20 11.20 2.00 . . . . . . . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2608 and 2604 for AI bulls.
Stat nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
mean -0 0 -1 11 1 -0.7 -0.1 0.01 -0.13 0.00 . 0.33 0.56 0.55 0.78 -0.01 . . . . . . . . . . . .
sd 45 45 46 59 75 3.2 2.6 0.03 0.65 0.45 . 1.18 0.69 1.49 2.16 0.05 . . . . . . . . . . . .
min -146 -152 -144 -147 -258 -11.0 -9.0 -0.07 -1.60 -0.90 . -3.20 -1.50 -3.30 -3.30 -0.10 . . . . . . . . . . . .
max 87 85 88 124 264 8.0 6.0 0.12 1.50 1.00 . 2.60 2.00 3.30 6.70 0.10 . . . . . . . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2608 and 2604, by AI bulls’ status.
Status No.  nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
A 23 7 8 7 21 9 -0.5 0.1 0.00 -0.04 0.03 . 0.51 0.60 0.67 0.98 0.00 . . . . . . . . . . . .
G 47 -4 -4 -5 6 -3 -0.8 -0.1 0.01 -0.17 -0.01 . 0.24 0.54 0.49 0.68 -0.01 . . . . . . . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2608 and 2604, by AI bulls’ year of birth.
Year No.  nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
2025 1 -2 7 -6 -9 -36 -1.0 -4.0 -0.01 0.30 0.40 . -0.30 0.30 0.10 -0.10 -0.10 . . . . . . . . . . . .
2024 11 -22 -20 -23 -18 -9 -0.5 -0.7 0.00 -0.48 -0.10 . -0.18 0.32 -0.02 0.66 -0.03 . . . . . . . . . . . .
2023 10 -5 -4 -6 5 28 -0.2 0.8 0.02 -0.33 -0.21 . 0.02 0.75 0.36 0.80 0.00 . . . . . . . . . . . .
2022 16 24 23 25 40 9 -0.5 0.8 0.01 0.24 0.24 . 0.76 0.73 1.13 1.08 0.01 . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 8 -34 -32 -35 -33 -52 -3.6 -2.2 0.00 -0.34 0.04 . -0.19 0.05 -0.07 0.98 0.00 . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020 10 20 19 20 43 -7 -0.4 0.0 -0.00 0.16 0.14 . 1.11 0.89 1.30 -0.04 -0.01 . . . . . . . . . . . .
2019 5 -1 -2 -1 21 75 2.2 2.4 0.00 -0.50 -0.58 . 0.62 0.62 0.82 -0.42 0.00 . . . . . . . . . . . .
2018 3 -26 -21 -28 -28 21 -0.3 -0.7 0.01 -0.50 -0.13 . -0.37 -0.03 -0.53 0.80 0.00 . . . . . . . . . . . .
2017 1 -7 -6 -8 -4 -23 -1.0 -1.0 0.02 0.10 -0.20 . 0.30 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.00 . . . . . . . . . . . .

PTAs statistics and distribution by indexes and traits

nm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -3.14
  • Slope (b): 1.03
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

fm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -1.46
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

cm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -4.12
  • Slope (b): 1.03
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

gm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): 7.32
  • Slope (b): 1.05
  • R-squared (R²): 0.94

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

mil

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.28
  • Slope (b): 0.97
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

fat

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -0.24
  • Slope (b): 0.94
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

pro

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.12
  • Slope (b): 0.94
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

scs

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): 0.07
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.95

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

pl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.96
  • Intercept (a): -0.24
  • Slope (b): 1.08
  • R-squared (R²): 0.93

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

liv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -0.05
  • Slope (b): 1.07
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

hlv

No data available for the comparison.

dpr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.74
  • Intercept (a): 0.37
  • Slope (b): 0.81
  • R-squared (R²): 0.55

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

hcr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.91
  • Intercept (a): 0.55
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.82

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

ccr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.81
  • Intercept (a): 0.58
  • Slope (b): 0.92
  • R-squared (R²): 0.65

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

efc

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.94
  • Intercept (a): 0.66
  • Slope (b): 1.41
  • R-squared (R²): 0.87

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

gl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 1

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

mfv

No data available for the comparison.

dpa

No data available for the comparison.

ket

No data available for the comparison.

mas

No data available for the comparison.

met

No data available for the comparison.

rpl

No data available for the comparison.

fs

No data available for the comparison.

rfi

No data available for the comparison.

mspd

No data available for the comparison.

dia

No data available for the comparison.

rsp

No data available for the comparison.

fsc

No data available for the comparison.

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

AY

Number of AI bulls in file format38 for breed AY: 58

Statistics PTAs evaluation 2608 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2608 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
mean 265 251 270 261 636 26.7 23.0 3.0 0.7 0.7 . 0.1 0.2 0.3 3.8 -0.4 . . . . . . . . . . . 13.2
sd 297 286 302 302 780 29.6 24.3 0.1 1.4 1.2 . 1.0 1.0 1.4 5.9 1.0 . . . . . . . . . . . 38.5
min -248 -219 -260 -295 -571 -25.0 -22.0 2.8 -3.3 -2.6 . -2.6 -2.2 -2.5 -8.7 -2.5 . . . . . . . . . . . -80.0
max 989 891 1032 1024 2689 100.0 66.0 3.2 4.9 3.9 . 3.2 3.7 5.0 21.1 2.2 . . . . . . . . . . . 106.0
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2604 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2604 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
mean 268 257 273 263 646 27.7 22.7 2.99 0.61 0.82 . 0.10 0.71 0.00 3.88 -0.39 . . . . . . . . . . . .
sd 297 281 305 306 722 30.2 24.3 0.11 1.45 1.16 . 1.35 1.27 1.41 5.31 0.97 . . . . . . . . . . . .
min -228 -211 -246 -293 -573 -23.0 -22.0 2.78 -3.90 -2.40 . -2.90 -2.30 -3.00 -6.20 -2.50 . . . . . . . . . . . .
max 990 889 1033 1025 2134 101.0 66.0 3.22 4.50 3.80 . 4.70 5.50 4.10 19.40 2.20 . . . . . . . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2608 and 2604 for AI bulls.
Stat nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
mean -4 -5 -3 -3 -9 -1.0 0.3 0.00 0.06 -0.10 . -0.05 -0.51 0.32 -0.12 -0.01 . . . . . . . . . . . .
sd 34 35 36 42 148 3.2 3.5 0.03 0.37 0.15 . 0.97 0.59 0.96 1.41 0.11 . . . . . . . . . . . .
min -72 -83 -70 -101 -207 -11.0 -4.0 -0.07 -0.70 -0.50 . -3.10 -1.80 -2.60 -3.80 -0.80 . . . . . . . . . . . .
max 136 117 144 139 813 11.0 16.0 0.10 1.20 0.20 . 1.70 1.00 2.50 3.20 0.10 . . . . . . . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2608 and 2604, by AI bulls’ status.
Status No.  nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
A 8 24 14 28 28 14 0.6 3.2 -0.00 0.20 -0.16 . 0.06 -0.57 0.65 -0.26 0.00 . . . . . . . . . . . .
F 5 -3 -2 -4 -7 -11 -1.0 -0.4 0.02 0.22 -0.06 . -0.30 -0.66 0.34 -0.14 0.00 . . . . . . . . . . . .
G 45 -9 -9 -8 -8 -13 -1.3 -0.2 0.00 0.02 -0.10 . -0.04 -0.48 0.26 -0.10 -0.01 . . . . . . . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2608 and 2604, by AI bulls’ year of birth.
Year No.  nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
2024 13 1 -0 1 2 -22 -0.9 -0.5 -0.01 0.14 -0.03 . 0.00 -0.54 0.48 0.61 -0.04 . . . . . . . . . . . .
2023 15 -12 -14 -12 -8 -4 -1.5 0.4 0.00 -0.09 -0.09 . 0.10 -0.59 0.34 -0.61 0.00 . . . . . . . . . . . .
2022 8 -1 -6 2 8 -50 0.1 0.2 0.01 0.05 -0.15 . 0.33 -0.14 0.65 -0.53 -0.03 . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 6 -14 -6 -18 -23 66 -3.2 -0.8 -0.01 0.22 -0.17 . -0.25 -0.75 -0.18 0.28 0.00 . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020 5 27 14 32 33 -33 1.6 3.0 0.02 0.22 -0.08 . 0.14 -0.22 0.62 -0.70 0.02 . . . . . . . . . . . .
2019 2 4 2 6 6 -4 -0.5 1.0 0.04 0.15 -0.15 . 0.05 -0.65 0.10 -1.30 0.00 . . . . . . . . . . . .
2018 5 -16 -15 -15 -20 6 -2.0 0.0 -0.00 -0.04 -0.16 . -0.56 -0.80 0.28 0.44 0.00 . . . . . . . . . . . .
2017 3 -3 -8 -2 -15 -5 -0.7 1.0 0.00 0.00 -0.20 . -0.60 -0.17 -0.73 0.07 0.00 . . . . . . . . . . . .

PTAs statistics and distribution by indexes and traits

nm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -1.55
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

fm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -7.74
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

cm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 1.1
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

gm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 3.17
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

mil

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -48.74
  • Slope (b): 1.06
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

fat

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.35
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

pro

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 0.46
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

scs

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): -0.06
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.94

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

pl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): 0.1
  • Slope (b): 0.93
  • R-squared (R²): 0.94

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

liv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.13
  • Slope (b): 1.03
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

hlv

No data available for the comparison.

dpr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.7
  • Intercept (a): 0
  • Slope (b): 0.53
  • R-squared (R²): 0.49

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

hcr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.9
  • Intercept (a): -0.28
  • Slope (b): 0.68
  • R-squared (R²): 0.81

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

ccr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.78
  • Intercept (a): 0.32
  • Slope (b): 0.8
  • R-squared (R²): 0.6

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

efc

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): -0.45
  • Slope (b): 1.08
  • R-squared (R²): 0.95

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

gl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

mfv

No data available for the comparison.

dpa

No data available for the comparison.

ket

No data available for the comparison.

mas

No data available for the comparison.

met

No data available for the comparison.

rpl

No data available for the comparison.

fs

No data available for the comparison.

rfi

No data available for the comparison.

mspd

No data available for the comparison.

dia

No data available for the comparison.

rsp

No data available for the comparison.

fsc

No data available for the comparison.

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

XD

Number of AI bulls in file format38 for breed XD: 65

Statistics PTAs evaluation 2608 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2608 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
mean 445 432 451 425 1369 63.6 43.8 2.9 0.7 1.3 0.8 0.6 0.3 1.4 5.0 -1.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 -0.5 0.3 0.0 -5 131 6.9 2.3 0.5 22.5
sd 161 165 160 163 595 18.8 14.6 0.1 1.0 0.9 0.4 1.0 0.9 1.3 1.4 0.9 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.2 0.8 0.2 . . . 0.6 1.1 37.7
min -535 -621 -502 -498 -2561 -29.0 -47.0 2.7 -3.7 -2.1 -0.2 -2.3 -2.0 -2.0 0.0 -4.1 -0.2 -0.4 -1.5 -3.4 -4.9 -0.7 -5 131 6.9 0.9 -2.3 -69.0
max 688 649 707 688 2260 99.0 64.0 3.4 2.5 3.0 1.6 3.0 3.0 4.2 8.9 2.4 0.4 0.5 1.3 1.5 1.3 0.5 -5 131 6.9 3.7 3.8 116.0
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2604 (click to expand/collapse)
Statistics PTAs evaluation 2604 for AI bulls
Stat nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
mean 459 447 466 434 1366 63.4 43.6 2.89 1.09 1.49 1.74 1.00 -0.11 1.01 1.62 -1.41 0.12 0.14 0.20 -0.33 0.31 -0.01 -6 137 6.79 . . .
sd 156 161 156 150 602 19.0 14.9 0.11 1.06 0.93 0.33 1.38 0.91 1.27 1.36 0.90 0.11 0.18 0.46 1.12 0.75 0.23 . . . . . .
min -482 -567 -450 -363 -2607 -30.0 -49.0 2.67 -3.00 -1.70 0.60 -3.90 -2.30 -2.70 -1.20 -4.10 -0.20 -0.30 -1.40 -3.30 -4.60 -0.70 -6 137 6.79 . . .
max 714 681 733 713 2258 98.0 67.0 3.40 3.20 3.40 2.50 5.70 2.90 3.90 7.70 2.40 0.30 0.50 1.20 1.50 1.30 0.50 -6 137 6.79 . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2608 and 2604 for AI bulls.
Stat nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
mean -15 -15 -15 -9 3 0.2 0.2 0.01 -0.40 -0.16 -0.90 -0.41 0.40 0.42 3.36 -0.03 0.03 -0.00 -0.02 -0.21 0.01 -0.00 1 -6 0.09 . . .
sd 27 26 27 35 59 2.6 2.3 0.02 0.38 0.21 0.30 0.85 0.48 0.90 1.01 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.09 0.32 0.12 0.05 . . . . . .
min -113 -110 -114 -138 -130 -8.0 -4.0 -0.04 -1.50 -0.70 -1.60 -4.80 -1.20 -4.20 0.10 -0.10 -0.10 -0.10 -0.30 -1.10 -0.30 -0.10 1 -6 0.09 . . .
max 54 51 55 76 259 10.0 10.0 0.08 0.70 0.60 0.00 2.80 1.30 3.70 5.20 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.40 0.20 0.10 1 -6 0.09 . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2608 and 2604, by AI bulls’ status.
Status No.  nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
A 6 8 7 8 24 14 -0.3 0.7 -0.00 0.02 -0.20 -0.63 0.50 -0.42 1.10 2.02 -0.05 0.02 0.00 0.00 -0.03 -0.05 0.05 . . . . . .
F 1 -53 -54 -52 -135 46 1.0 2.0 0.03 -0.70 -0.10 0.00 -4.80 0.70 -4.20 3.20 0.00 0.00 -0.10 0.00 -0.30 -0.10 0.00 1 -6 0.09 . . .
G 58 -16 -16 -16 -10 2 0.2 0.1 0.01 -0.43 -0.16 -0.95 -0.43 0.47 0.43 3.51 -0.03 0.03 -0.00 -0.02 -0.22 0.02 -0.01 . . . . . .
PTA comparison between evaluations 2608 and 2604, by AI bulls’ year of birth.
Year No.  nm
($) 		fm
($) 		cm
($) 		gm
($) 		mil
(lb) 		fat
(lb) 		pro
(lb) 		scs
(log2) 		pl
(mo) 		liv
(%) 		hlv
(%) 		dpr
(%) 		hcr
(%) 		ccr
(%) 		efc
(d) 		gl
(d) 		mfv
(%) 		dpa
(%) 		ket
(%) 		mas
(%) 		met
(%) 		rpl
(%) 		fs
(lb) 		rfi
(lb) 		mspd
(lb/min) 		dia
(%) 		rsp
(%) 		fsc
(d)
2025 5 -13 -14 -14 -2 -6 0.0 0.0 0.02 -0.40 -0.30 -0.92 -0.06 0.40 0.62 3.74 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 -0.00 0.00 0.00 . . . . . .
2024 18 -22 -22 -22 -16 1 0.1 0.0 0.01 -0.46 -0.10 -1.11 -0.39 0.47 0.46 3.62 -0.02 0.02 -0.02 -0.05 -0.17 -0.06 -0.01 . . . . . .
2023 20 -19 -19 -19 -14 -5 0.2 -0.1 0.01 -0.49 -0.18 -0.84 -0.55 0.46 0.38 3.54 -0.03 0.04 -0.01 -0.02 -0.39 0.08 -0.01 . . . . . .
2022 12 -5 -7 -5 2 18 0.5 0.8 -0.01 -0.32 -0.18 -0.98 -0.34 0.46 0.57 3.41 -0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 -0.13 0.06 0.00 . . . . . .
2020 6 6 4 6 11 31 0.7 1.3 0.00 -0.18 -0.15 -0.65 -0.17 -0.20 0.38 2.65 -0.03 0.03 0.02 0.00 -0.05 0.00 0.03 . . . . . .
2018 1 -18 -15 -19 -11 -12 -1.0 -1.0 0.01 -0.40 0.00 -0.50 -0.30 1.30 0.50 3.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.10 -0.10 0.00 . . . . . .
2017 2 -33 -34 -32 -78 22 1.0 1.0 0.01 -0.50 -0.05 -0.15 -2.75 0.55 -2.35 1.65 0.00 0.00 -0.05 0.00 -0.25 -0.10 0.00 1 -6 0.09 . . .
2016 1 8 10 7 64 -91 -3.0 -3.0 0.02 0.70 -0.40 -0.80 2.80 -0.60 3.70 0.20 -0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.20 -0.30 0.10 . . . . . .

PTAs statistics and distribution by indexes and traits

nm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -20.65
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

fm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -21.79
  • Slope (b): 1.02
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

cm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -19.95
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

gm

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -35.55
  • Slope (b): 1.06
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

mil

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): 25.18
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.99

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

fat

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 1.35
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

pro

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): 1.45
  • Slope (b): 0.97
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

scs

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -0.03
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.96

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

pl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.94
  • Intercept (a): -0.25
  • Slope (b): 0.87
  • R-squared (R²): 0.88

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

liv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -0.14
  • Slope (b): 0.98
  • R-squared (R²): 0.95

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

hlv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.66
  • Intercept (a): -0.52
  • Slope (b): 0.78
  • R-squared (R²): 0.43

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

dpr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.79
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 0.6
  • R-squared (R²): 0.62

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

hcr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.86
  • Intercept (a): 0.38
  • Slope (b): 0.86
  • R-squared (R²): 0.74

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

ccr

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.74
  • Intercept (a): 0.69
  • Slope (b): 0.73
  • R-squared (R²): 0.55

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

efc

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.72
  • Intercept (a): 3.8
  • Slope (b): 0.73
  • R-squared (R²): 0.52

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

gl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 1
  • Intercept (a): -0.02
  • Slope (b): 1
  • R-squared (R²): 1

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

mfv

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.9
  • Intercept (a): 0.03
  • Slope (b): 0.99
  • R-squared (R²): 0.81

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

dpa

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.96
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 1.03
  • R-squared (R²): 0.92

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

ket

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): -0.03
  • Slope (b): 1.04
  • R-squared (R²): 0.97

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

mas

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.97
  • Intercept (a): -0.19
  • Slope (b): 1.06
  • R-squared (R²): 0.93

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

met

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.99
  • Intercept (a): -0.01
  • Slope (b): 1.05
  • R-squared (R²): 0.98

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

rpl

Linear regression summary for AI bulls (2608 ~ a + b * 2604)

  • Correlation (r): 0.98
  • Intercept (a): 0
  • Slope (b): 1.01
  • R-squared (R²): 0.95

Group-wise PTA comparison plots (by AI status)

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

fs

No data available for the comparison.

rfi

No data available for the comparison.

mspd

No data available for the comparison.

dia

No data available for the comparison.

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

rsp

No data available for the comparison.

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

fsc

No data available for the comparison.

Distribution of PTAs (2608) by AI status

 

Haplotypes check

Statistics by breed, on all evaluated bulls

HO

  • Bulls with haplotype info (n.): 52080
  • Bulls first receiving haplotype info in evaluation 2608 (n.): 583
  • Bulls losing haplotype info in evaluation 2608 (n.): 71
  • Bulls with haplotype STATUS CHANGE in evaluation 2608 vs 2604 (n.): 8
Haplotype status changes:
Haplotype From (2604) To (2608) No. 
HH2 0 1 1
HH2 1 0 1
HH3 0 1 1
HH6 0 1 1
HHP 1 2 1
HHR 0 1 1
HHR 1 2 1
HMW 3 0 1

JE

  • Bulls with haplotype info (n.): 9080
  • Bulls first receiving haplotype info in evaluation 2608 (n.): 117
  • Bulls losing haplotype info in evaluation 2608 (n.): 3
  • Bulls with haplotype STATUS CHANGE in evaluation 2608 vs 2604 (n.): 3
Haplotype status changes:
Haplotype From (2604) To (2608) No. 
JNS 1 0 3

BS

  • Bulls with haplotype info (n.): 6509
  • Bulls first receiving haplotype info in evaluation 2608 (n.): 22
  • Bulls losing haplotype info in evaluation 2608 (n.): 1
  • No bulls with haplotypes change.

AY

  • Bulls with haplotype info (n.): 1089
  • Bulls first receiving haplotype info in evaluation 2608 (n.): 7
  • No bulls with haplotypes change.